Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29427076›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2018

Giant fish-killing water bug reveals ancient and dynamic venom evolution in Heteroptera.

Andrew A Walker, Maria José Hernández-Vargas, Gerardo Corzo, Bryan G Fry, Glenn F King

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Production, composition, and mode of action of the painful defensive venom produced by a limacodid caterpillar,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew A WalkerInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. a.walker@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1296-6593
Maria José Hernández-VargasInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 61500, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Gerardo CorzoInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 61500, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Bryan G FryVenom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Glenn F KingInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. glenn.king@imb.uq.edu.au.
The University of Queensland · AUUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

True Bugs (Insecta: Heteroptera) produce venom or saliva with diverse bioactivities depending on their feeding strategies. However, little is known about the molecular evolution of the venom toxins underlying these biological activities. We examined venom of the giant fish-killing water bug Lethocerus distinctifemur (Insecta: Belostomatidae) using infrared spectroscopy, transcriptomics, and proteomics. We report 132 venom proteins including putative enzymes, cytolytic toxins, and antimicrobial peptides. Over 73% (96 proteins) showed homology to venom proteins from assassin bugs (Reduviidae), including 21% (28 proteins from seven families) not known from other sources. These data suggest that numerous protein families were recruited into venom and diversified rapidly following the switch from phytophagy to predation by ancestral heteropterans, and then were retained over > 200 my of evolution. In contrast, trophic switches to blood-feeding (e.g. in Triatominae and Cimicidae) or reversions to plant-feeding (e.g., in Pentatomomorpha) were accompanied by rapid changes in the composition of venom/saliva, including the loss of many protein families.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsArthropod VenomsFishesGene Expression ProfilingGenes, InsectHeteropteraInsect ProteinsPhylogenyProteomicsSequence Homology, Amino AcidToxins, BiologicalWaterArthropod VenomsInsect ProteinsToxins, BiologicalWaterBelostomatidaeHeteropteraNepomorphaSalivaTrophic shiftVenomVenom evolution

Identifiers

PMID29427076
PMCPMC11105384
OpenAlexW2785751995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.