ReviewPharmacoEconomics2018
Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: the Past, the Present and the Future.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
105 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of methodological approaches in economic evaluations of maternal and neonatal sepsis interventions in low- and middle-income countries.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of tanezumab and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in efficacy and safety for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of psychological treatments for common mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Health policy and planning · 2023Pooled it
- Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Malaria Control Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2021Pooled it
- Guidance for the Harmonisation and Improvement of Economic Evaluations of Personalised Medicine.PharmacoEconomics · 2021Pooled it
- Use of Productivity Loss/Gain in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses for Drugs: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2021Pooled it
- Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Software in Healthcare Priority Setting: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Pooled it
- Cost Effectiveness of Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid and Disease-Modifying Drugs in Knee Osteoarthritis.PharmacoEconomics · 2018Pooled it
- Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Dose Colchicine Prophylaxis When Starting Allopurinol Using the "Start-Low Go-Slow" Approach for Gout: Evidence From a Noninferiority Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.Arthritis care & research · 2026Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of a self-management maintenance programme following pulmonary rehabilitation: a UK randomised controlled trial for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Trial
- Four Year Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Vaginal Pessary Self-Management Versus Clinic-Based Care for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (TOPSY): Long Term Follow-Up of a Randomised Controlled Superiority Trial.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of the Self-Help Plus Intervention for Adult Syrian Refugees Hosted in Turkey.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Meta-Analysis of Incremental Net Benefit from Trial-Based Health Economic Evaluations in R: A Tutorial.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Review
- Article
- Uncertainty in Economic Evaluation: A Pragmatic Guide for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Agencies in Resource-Constrained Settings.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Review
- Innovative advances and future perspectives in injectable hydrogels for wound healing: a comprehensive review.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- Article
45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cost-effectiveness (CE) thresholds are being discussed more frequently and there have been many new developments in this area; however, there is a lack of understanding about what thresholds mean and their implications. This paper provides an overview of the CE threshold literature. First, the meaning of a CE threshold and the key assumptions involved (perfect divisibility, marginal increments in budget, etc.) are highlighted using a hypothetical example, and the use of historic/heuristic estimates of the threshold is noted along with their limitations. Recent endeavours to estimate the empirical value of the thresholds, both from the supply side and the demand side, are then presented. The impact on CE thresholds of future directions for the field, such as thresholds across sectors and the incorporation of multiple criteria beyond quality-adjusted life-years as a measure of 'value', are highlighted. Finally, a number of common issues and misconceptions associated with CE thresholds are addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29427072What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.