Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29427039›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2019

Introducing laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in general practice: a retrospective cohort study based on a nationwide registry database in Japan.

Yasuhiro Kodera, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Hiraku Kumamaru, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Naoki Hiki, Tsuyoshi Etoh, Michitaka Honda, Hiroaki Miyata, Yuichi Yamashita, Yasuyuki Seto and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological gastric surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Phase II study of S-1 and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the gastric or esophagogastric junction: KSCC1601.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Single-arm confirmatory trial of laparoscopy-assisted total or proximal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1401.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer over conventional laparoscopic approach: a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide registry database in Japan.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Minimally invasive versus open completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: a nationwide propensity score-matched analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Escalation and de-escalation in surgery for gastric cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Differential impact of frailty on surgical and non-surgical site complications in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Yasuhiro KoderaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. ykodera@med.nagoya-y.ac.jp.
Kazuhiro YoshidaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Hiraku KumamaruDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro KakejiDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Naoki HikiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsuyoshi EtohDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan.
Michitaka HondaDepartment of Minimally Invasive Medical and Surgical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Hiroaki MiyataDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichi YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yasuyuki SetoThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan.
Seigo KitanoOita University, Oita, Japan.
Hiroyuki KonnoHamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Oita University · JPFukuoka University · JPFukushima Medical University · JPGifu University · JPHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPKeio University · JPKobe University · JPNagoya University · JPThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is considered a technically demanding procedure with safety issues, it has been performed in several hospitals in Japan. Data from a nationwide web-based data entry system for surgical procedures (NCD) that started enrollment in 2011 are now available for analysis.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 32,144 patients who underwent total gastrectomy and were registered in the NCD database between January 2012 and December 2013. Mortality and morbidities were compared between patients who received LTG and those who underwent open total gastrectomy (OTG) in the propensity score-matched Stage I cohort and Stage II-IV cohort.

resultsThere was no significant difference in mortality rate between LTG and OTG in both cohorts. Operating time was significantly longer in LTG while the blood loss was smaller. In the Stage I cohort, LTG, performed in 33.6% of the patients, was associated with significantly shorter hospital stay but significantly higher incidence of readmission, reoperation, and anastomotic leakage (5.4% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.01). In the Stage II-IV cohort, LTG was performed in only 8.8% of the patients and was associated with significantly higher incidence of leakage (5.7% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.02) although the hospital stay was shorter (15 days vs. 17 days, p < 0.001).

conclusionLTG was more discreetly introduced than distal gastrectomy, but remained a technically demanding procedure as of 2013. This procedure should be performed only among the well-trained and informed laparoscopic team.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleGastrectomyHumansJapanLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRegistriesRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsGastric cancerLaparoscopic surgeryNational Clinical DatabaseOpen gastrectomyPropensity score matching

Identifiers

PMID29427039
OpenAlexW2789513818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.