ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019
[Autoimmunity and glaucoma].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenging glaucoma with emerging therapies: an overview of advancements against the silent thief of sight.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Ocular Biomechanics and Glaucoma.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- AgonisticFrontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Synapse and Receptor Alterations in Two Different S100B-Induced Glaucoma-Like Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Current Medical Therapy and Future Trends in the Management of Glaucoma Treatment.Journal of ophthalmology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In addition to the clinically most relevant risk factor for glaucoma, i.e., elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), there are other factors with high relevance for the disease. Changes in the autoimmune component of the immune system are of particular importance. Clinical studies have demonstrated alterations in different autoantibodies in glaucoma patients compared to healthy controls, some of which increase in abundance/have a raised titer, but also some which have a reduced titer. These changes have a distinct potential-not only as a tool for early glaucoma detection, but also as a therapeutic option due to the documented neuroprotective effects of some of these antibodies. Several antibodies displaying lower abundance in glaucoma patients, e.g., antibodies against 14-3-3 proteins, γ‑/α-synuclein, or also against glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), show neuroprotective effects on retinal ganglion cells in vivo and in vitro. To assess the relevance of changes detected in the immune system of glaucoma patients, "‑omics-based" analyses of different ocular tissues are of particular importance alongside cell culture studies. In this manner, not only samples derived from experimental studies but also samples derived from glaucoma patients in even very small amounts (e. g., tears, aqueous humor, serum, or post-mortem retina) can be analyzed in detail in terms of protein and, in particular, antibody changes. Modern mass spectrometric proteomic characterization of relevant samples will deliver valuable information concerning the understanding of molecular disease mechanisms in the coming years, thus also improving diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.