Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29427013›Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2018

Assessment of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: a systematic review of literature.

Renato Carneiro de Freitas Chaves, Thiago Domingos Corrêa, Ary Serpa Neto, Bruno de Arruda Bravim, Ricardo Luiz Cordioli, Fabio Tanzillo Moreira, Karina Tavares Timenetsky, Murillo Santucci Cesar de Assunção

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04574011 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness With Non-invasive Dynamic Parameters in Spontaneous Breathing Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled30ConditionsFluid ResponsivenessArmsPassive leg raising
NCT05264454 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on IVC Measurements Using Point of Care Ultrasound

TypeinterventionalSponsorNova Scotia Health AuthorityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsFluid OverloadArmshigh flow nasal cannulae
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The time course of fluid responsiveness.Annals of intensive care · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A robust Fourier-based method to measure pulse pressure variability.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Renato Carneiro de Freitas ChavesIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627/701, 5th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 05651-901, Brazil. chavesrcf@hotmail.com.
Thiago Domingos CorrêaIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627/701, 5th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 05651-901, Brazil.
Ary Serpa NetoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627/701, 5th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 05651-901, Brazil.
Bruno de Arruda BravimIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627/701, 5th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 05651-901, Brazil.
Ricardo Luiz CordioliIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627/701, 5th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 05651-901, Brazil.
Fabio Tanzillo MoreiraIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627/701, 5th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 05651-901, Brazil.
Karina Tavares TimenetskyIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627/701, 5th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 05651-901, Brazil.
Murillo Santucci Cesar de AssunçãoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627/701, 5th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 05651-901, Brazil.
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients who increase stoke volume or cardiac index more than 10 or 15% after a fluid challenge are usually considered fluid responders. Assessment of fluid responsiveness prior to volume expansion is critical to avoid fluid overload, which has been associated with poor outcomes. Maneuvers to assess fluid responsiveness are well established in mechanically ventilated patients; however, few studies evaluated maneuvers to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of literature addressing the available methods to assess fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Studies were identified through electronic literature search of PubMed from 01/08/2009 to 01/08/2016 by two independent authors. No restrictions on language were adopted. Quality of included studies was evaluated with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Our search strategy identified 537 studies, and 9 studies were added through manual search. Of those, 15 studies (12 intensive care unit patients; 1 emergency department patients; 1 intensive care unit and emergency department patients; 1 operating room) were included in this analysis. In total, 649 spontaneously breathing patients were assessed for fluid responsiveness. Of those, 340 (52%) were deemed fluid responsive. Pulse pressure variation during the Valsalva maneuver (∆PPV) of 52% (AUC ± SD: 0.98 ± 0.03) and passive leg raising-induced change in stroke volume (∆SV-PLR) > 13% (AUC ± SD: 0.96 ± 0.03) showed the highest accuracy to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Our systematic review indicates that regardless of the limitations of each maneuver, fluid responsiveness can be assessed in spontaneously breathing patients. Further well-designed studies, with adequate simple size and power, are necessary to confirm the real accuracy of the different methods used to assess fluid responsiveness in this population of patients.

Indexed as

Critical careEchocardiographyFluid responsivenessIntensive carePulse pressureSpontaneously breathingStroke volume

Identifiers

PMID29427013
PMCPMC5807252
OpenAlexW2798052656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.