ArticleWorld journal of urology2018
Robotic surgery: new robots and finally some real competition!
Article in World journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is secondary robotic pyeloplasty safe and effective as primary robotic pyeloplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Fundamental kinematic indicators predict surgical expertise and clinical outcomes in robot-assisted surgery.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Robotic adrenalectomy: comparison of DaVinci, HUGO™-RAS and VersiusUpdates in surgery · 2026Article
- Safe introduction of hinotori™ for robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy as the second robotic system.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Comparison of Features of Robotic Surgery Systems in Abdominal Surgeries: A Narrative Review Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Carina™ modular robotic-assisted left lower lobectomy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage IIIA squamous cell lung cancer: a case report.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Safety and feasibility of novel single-port robotic systems in colorectal cancer surgery: a comparative study with the da Vinci Xi system.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Current Evidence in Robotic Colorectal Surgery.Cancers · 2025Review
- Initial experience with the Carina™ platform in robotic-assisted hysterectomy for gynecological malignant disease.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Supporting managerial decisions: a comparison of new robotic platforms through time-driven activity-based costing within a value-based healthcare framework.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Performance and safety of Kangduo surgical robot versus da Vinci robotic system for urologic surgeries.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of short- and mid-term outcomes between the Senhance digital laparoscopic system and laparoscopic colectomy: a propensity score matching study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Speech-mediated manipulation of da Vinci surgical system for continuous surgical flow.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Article
- Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Versius surgical platform: An objective criticism and a guide for an optimal surgical setup.Arab journal of urology · 2025Article
- Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in complex renal tumors using the Versius platform: An initial but promising experience.Arab journal of urology · 2025Article
- A Case of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Using the Senhance Digital Laparoscopy System for Rectal Cancer.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Robotic Surgery for Urologic Tumors.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Comparison between DaVinciJournal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Early experience and future prospects regarding use of newly developed surgical robot system, hinotori, in the field of urologic cancer surgery.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Review
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFor the last 20 years, the predominant robot used in laparoscopic surgery has been Da Vinci by Intuitive Surgical. This monopoly situation has led to rising costs and relatively slow innovation. This article aims to discuss the two new robotic devices for laparoscopic surgery which have received regulatory approval for human use in different parts of the world. MATERIALS: A short description of the Senhance Surgical Robotic System and the REVO-I Robot Platform and their pros and cons compared to the Da Vinci system is presented. A discussion about the differences between the three robotic systems now in the market is presented, as well as a short review of the present state of robotic assistance in surgery and where we are headed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.