Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29426987›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Coronary CT angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: Standard-dose and low-dose imaging with a high-resolution whole-heart CT scanner.

Anna Matveeva, Rainer R Schmitt, Karoline Edtinger, Matthias Wagner, Sebastian Kerber, Thomas Deneke, Michael Uder, Sebastian Barth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Coronary artery disease in atrial fibrillation ablation: impact on arrhythmic outcomes.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna MatveevaDepartment of Radiology, Cardiovascular Centre GmbH, Salzburger Leite 1, 97616, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany. matveeva@mail.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3889-4209
Rainer R SchmittDepartment of Radiology, Cardiovascular Centre GmbH, Salzburger Leite 1, 97616, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany.
Karoline EdtingerDepartment of Radiology, Cardiovascular Centre GmbH, Salzburger Leite 1, 97616, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany.
Matthias WagnerDepartment of Radiology, Cardiovascular Centre GmbH, Salzburger Leite 1, 97616, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany.
Sebastian KerberDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Centre GmbH, Salzburger Leite 1, 97616, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany.
Thomas DenekeDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Centre GmbH, Salzburger Leite 1, 97616, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany.
Michael UderDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Sebastian BarthDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Centre GmbH, Salzburger Leite 1, 97616, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany.
Rhön-Klinikum · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

Rhoen-Klinikum AG, Bad Neustadt, Germany FB81
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare image quality, observer confidence, radiation exposure in the standard-dose (SD-CCTA) and low-dose (LD-CCTA) protocols of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). MATERIAL AND

methodsCCTA was performed in 303 patients using a CT scanner with 16-cm coverage (111 scans during sinus rhythm (SR); 192 during AF). LD-CCTA was used in 218 patients; SD-CCTA in 85 patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD). Image quality and observer confidence were evaluated on 5-point scales. Radiation doses were recorded.

resultsImage quality was superior in the SD-CCTA compared to the LD-CCTA (SR 1.45±0.40; AF 1.72±0.46; vs. SR 1.83±0.48; AF 1.92±0.50; p < 0.001). Observers were more confident with SD-CCTA than with LD-CCTA (SR 1.38±0.33; AF 1.61±0.43; vs. SR 1.70±0.45; AF 1.82±0.50; p < 0.001). Radiation doses in AF were significantly higher than in the SR (LD-CCTA, 1.68±0.71 mSv; SD-CCTA, 3.72±1.95 mSv; vs. LD-CCTA, 1.3 ±0.52 mSv; SD-CCTA, 2.67±1.47 mSv; p < 0.001).

conclusionUsing a low-dose protocol in AF, radiation exposure can be decreased by 50 % at the expense of 20 % impaired image quality. A low-dose CCTA protocol can be considered in young patients, whereas the standard-dose protocol is recommended for older patients and those suspected of having CAD. KEY POINTS: • Whole-heart CT allows visualization of the coronary arteries in atrial fibrillation. • Low-dose CT decreases radiation exposure by 50%, image quality by 20%. • Standard-dose CT seems advantageous when concomitant coronary artery disease is suspected.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageAtrial FibrillationComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyFemaleHeartHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation ExposureAtrial fibrillationCoronary artery diseaseCoronary CT angiographyImage qualityRadiation exposure

Identifiers

PMID29426987
OpenAlexW2790242237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.