Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29426972›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2018

Depression Induced by Total Mastectomy, Breast Conserving Surgery and Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Chengjiao Zhang, Guangfu Hu, Ewelina Biskup, Xiaochun Qiu, Hongwei Zhang, Haiyin Zhang

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in terms of patient survival rate and quality of life in breast cancer.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Chengjiao ZhangDepartment of Psychological Measurement, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Guangfu HuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Huangpu District Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Ewelina BiskupShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xiaochun QiuMedical School Library, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hongwei ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. zhang.hongwei@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Haiyin ZhangDepartment of Psychological Measurement, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. haiyinz2001@126.com.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Huangpu District Central Hospital · CNShanghai Mental Health Center · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

Shanghai Mental Health Center General Scientific Research foundation of ShanghaiZhongshan Hospital grants Youth Fundation of Zhongshan Hospital grants 2016Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to determine whether different type of surgery induces different depression occurrence in female breast cancer at mean time more than 1-year term postoperatively.

methodsA systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, OvidSP, EBSCO and PsycARTICLES was conducted. Observational clinical studies that compared the depression incidence in different surgery groups and presented empirical findings were selected.

resultsSixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including 5, 4, 2 and 5 studies compared depression between total mastectomy (TM) and breast conserving therapy (BCS), TM and breast reconstruction (BR), BCS and BR, or among all three groups (TM, BCS and BR), respectively. Only 1 of 5 studies, which subjected to multivariate analysis of depression in female breast cancer, reported a statistically significant effect of type of surgery on depression occurrence. Our meta-analysis showed no significant differences among the three types of surgery, with BCS patients versus TM patients (relative risk [RR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.01; P = 0.06), BR patients versus TM patients (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.71-1.06; P = 0.16) and BCS patients versus BR patients (RR = 1.10; 95% CI 0.89-1.35; P = 0.37), respectively.

conclusionsOur study showed that there were no statistically significant differences concerning the occurrence of depressive symptoms in breast cancer patients as a consequence of TM, BCS or BR at mean time more than 1-year term postoperatively.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDepressionFemaleHumansMammaplastyMastectomy, SegmentalMastectomy, Simple

Identifiers

PMID29426972
OpenAlexW2791687281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.