ArticleSkeletal radiology2018
Epiphyseal hyperplasia caused by an ectopic ossification center of the distal tibia: presentation of a pediatric case with 13 years of radiological surveillance.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herein, we report the case of a 4-year-old boy, who presented with a cortical lytic lesion of his distal tibia. It was located eccentrically, measured 2 cm in its craniocaudal diameter, and was associated with a lamella-like soft-tissue mineralization that resembled a periosteal reaction. Thus, the lesion's radiographic features were initially suggestive of an aggressive disease. However, further imaging revealed the lesion to be of cartilaginous origin and to extend into the metaphysis, thus creating the aspect of hyperplastic epiphyseal cartilage. This cartilaginous hyperplasia was likely caused by an ectopic ossification center, although no similar cases have yet been reported. As radiology and clinics no longer indicated the imminent threat of a high-grade malignancy, we decided against a biopsy to avoid interfering with epiphyseal growth. However, because of the unprecedented nature of the given constellation, we closely monitored the lesion radiologically to rule out an untypical manifestation of a benign but potentially expanding lesion, in addition to a growth disturbance resulting from the lesion itself. However, further imaging indicated that mineralization and ossifications, which were already present at the lesion's initial presentation, increased over time, until the lesion fully disappeared after 13 years of clinical and radiological surveillance. This case is outstanding because of its singular morphology and the long-term follow-up that illustrates its self-limiting natural course. This report provides support in differential diagnosis to help discriminate potentially self-limiting conditions from other diseases that may require invasive diagnosis and/or therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.