Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29426846›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Contributions of Pavlovian incentive motivation to cue-potentiated feeding.

Andrew T Marshall, Briac Halbout, Angela T Liu, Sean B Ostlund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew T MarshallDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Center for Addiction Neuroscience, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. marshaa1@uci.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0068-8138
Briac HalboutDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Center for Addiction Neuroscience, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Angela T LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Center for Addiction Neuroscience, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Sean B OstlundDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Center for Addiction Neuroscience, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. sostlund@uci.edu.

Funding

Cholinergic regulation of striatal neurochemistry in cue-triggered decision-makingR01MH106972 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI OSTLUND, SEAN BJORN · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Neurochemical bases for changes in decision-making across the lifespanR01AG045380 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAIDMENT, NIGEL T, MURPHY, NIALL P · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Cocaine-Seeking and the Transfer of Behavioral ControlR01DA029035 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI OSTLUND, SEAN BJORN · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Cafeteria diet-induced dysregulation of food seeking: neurochemical basesR01DK098709 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAIDMENT, NIGEL T, MURPHY, NIALL P · 2014 to 2016
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG045380NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029035NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098709NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cues signaling the availability of palatable food acquire the ability to potentiate food seeking and consumption. The current study employed a combination of behavioral, pharmacological, and analytical techniques to probe the role of Pavlovian incentive motivation in cue-potentiated feeding. We show that a cue paired with sucrose solution (CS+) can transfer its control over feeding to stimulate sucrose consumption at a new receptacle, and that this effect depends on activation of D1 dopamine receptors, which is known to modulate other forms of cue-motivated behavior but not taste palatability. Microstructural analyses of sucrose-licking behavior revealed that the CS+ tended to increase the frequency with which rats engaged in active bouts of licking behavior without having a reliable effect on the duration of those licking bouts, a measure that was instead associated with sucrose palatability. Furthermore, we found that individual differences in CS+ elicited increases in bout frequency were associated with total sucrose intake at test, supporting the view that this process was related to meaningful dysregulation of eating behavior. The current study, therefore, (1) demonstrates that a dopamine-dependent Pavlovian incentive motivational process can mediate cue-potentiated feeding, and (2) lays out an experimental and analytical approach for parsing this aspect of behavior.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalCuesDopamineFeeding BehaviorMaleMotivationRatsRats, Long-EvansReceptors, Dopamine D1SucroseDopamineReceptors, Dopamine D1Sucrose

Identifiers

PMID29426846
PMCPMC5807356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.