ArticleJMIR medical informatics2018
The Use of Communication Apps by Medical Staff in the Australian Health Care System: Survey Study on Prevalence and Use.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Digital Health Interventions Are Effective for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Self-Management: A Systematic Review.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Mobile health technologies supporting colonoscopy preparation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- The use of communication applications among anaesthetists and other medical professionals in Australia: results of a national survey.Anaesthesia and intensive care · 2026Article
- Adoption and Use of Social Media in Health Care Among Medical Residents: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- When practice outpaces policy: Whatsapp use among nursing and medical staff in Israeli hospitals.Israel journal of health policy research · 2026Article
- Evaluating the performance of a virtual platform 'T-BOM' for mentorship in tropical diseases research among early career scientists: Insights from a pilot in Nigeria and other resource-limited settings.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2024Article
- A Survey of Telemedicine Use by Doctors in District Hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Use of Instant Messaging Software in a German Hospital-An Exploratory Investigation among Physicians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- An Audit and Survey of Informal Use of Instant Messaging for Dermatology in District Hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The Opportunities and Challenges of Digital Anatomy for Medical Sciences: Narrative Review.JMIR medical education · 2022Review
- Use of the Vula App to refer patients in the West Coast District: A descriptive exploratory qualitative study.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2022Article
- Shining a light on an additional clinical burden: work-related digital communication survey study - COVID-19 impact on NHS staff wellbeing.Humanities & social sciences communications · 2022Article
- WhatsApp in Clinical Practice-The Challenges of Record Keeping and Storage. A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Team Dynamics in Hospital Workflows: An Exploratory Study of a Smartphone Task Manager.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Development of a "Cellphone Stewardship Framework": Legal, Regulatory, and Ethical Issues.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2021Article
- Understanding the stakeholders' preferences on a mobile application to reduce door to balloon time in the management of ST-elevated myocardial infarction patients - a qualitative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Ethical Considerations for Participatory Health through Social Media: Healthcare Workforce and Policy Maker Perspectives.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2020Article
- LeishCareThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
- Making surgery safer in an increasingly digital world: the internet-friend or foe?World journal of urology · 2020Review
- Mobile phones in the orthopedic operating room: Microbial colonization and antimicrobial resistance.World journal of orthopedics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of communication apps on mobile phones offers an efficient, unobtrusive, and portable mode of communication for medical staff. The potential enhancements in patient care and education appear significant, with clinical details able to be shared quickly within multidisciplinary teams, supporting rapid integration of disparate information, and more efficient patient care. However, sharing patient data in this way also raises legal and ethical issues. No data is currently available demonstrating how widespread the use of these apps are, doctor's attitudes towards them, or what guides clinician choice of app.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to quantify and qualify the use of communication apps among medical staff in clinical situations, their role in patient care, and knowledge and attitudes towards safety, key benefits, potential disadvantages, and policy implications.
methodsMedical staff in hospitals across Victoria (Australia) were invited to participate in an anonymous 33-question survey. The survey collected data on respondent's demographics, their use of communication apps in clinical settings, attitudes towards communication apps, perceptions of data "safety," and why one communication app was chosen over others.
resultsCommunication apps in Victorian hospitals are in widespread use from students to consultants, with WhatsApp being the primary app used. The median number of messages shared per day was 12, encompassing a range of patient information. All respondents viewed these apps positively in quickly communicating patient information in a clinical setting; however, all had concerns about the privacy implications arising from sharing patient information in this way. In total, 67% (60/90) considered patient data "moderately safe" on these apps, and 50% (46/90) were concerned the use of these apps was inconsistent with current legislation and policy. Apps were more likely to be used if they were fast, easy to use, had an easy login process, and were already in widespread use.
conclusionsCommunication app use by medical personnel in Victorian hospitals is pervasive. These apps contribute to enhanced communication between medical staff, but their use raises compliance issues, most notably with Australian privacy legislation. Development of privacy-compliant apps such as MedX needs to prioritize a user-friendly interface and market the product as a privacy-compliant comparator to apps previously adapted to health care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.