Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29426813›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2018

The Use of Communication Apps by Medical Staff in the Australian Health Care System: Survey Study on Prevalence and Use.

Amanda Nikolic, Nilmini Wickramasinghe, Damian Claydon-Platt, Vikram Balakrishnan, Philip Smart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Survey of Telemedicine Use by Doctors in District Hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Use of Instant Messaging Software in a German Hospital-An Exploratory Investigation among Physicians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Use of the Vula App to refer patients in the West Coast District: A descriptive exploratory qualitative study.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. WhatsApp in Clinical Practice-The Challenges of Record Keeping and Storage. A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Development of a "Cellphone Stewardship Framework": Legal, Regulatory, and Ethical Issues.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. LeishCareThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda Nikolic *General Surgery and Gastroenterology Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4650-6907
Nilmini WickramasingheHealth Information Management, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1314-8843
Damian Claydon-PlattInformation Technology Department, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2821-6001
Vikram BalakrishnanDepartment of Surgery, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5223-9334
Philip SmartGeneral Surgery and Gastroenterology Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8362-7260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of communication apps on mobile phones offers an efficient, unobtrusive, and portable mode of communication for medical staff. The potential enhancements in patient care and education appear significant, with clinical details able to be shared quickly within multidisciplinary teams, supporting rapid integration of disparate information, and more efficient patient care. However, sharing patient data in this way also raises legal and ethical issues. No data is currently available demonstrating how widespread the use of these apps are, doctor's attitudes towards them, or what guides clinician choice of app.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to quantify and qualify the use of communication apps among medical staff in clinical situations, their role in patient care, and knowledge and attitudes towards safety, key benefits, potential disadvantages, and policy implications.

methodsMedical staff in hospitals across Victoria (Australia) were invited to participate in an anonymous 33-question survey. The survey collected data on respondent's demographics, their use of communication apps in clinical settings, attitudes towards communication apps, perceptions of data "safety," and why one communication app was chosen over others.

resultsCommunication apps in Victorian hospitals are in widespread use from students to consultants, with WhatsApp being the primary app used. The median number of messages shared per day was 12, encompassing a range of patient information. All respondents viewed these apps positively in quickly communicating patient information in a clinical setting; however, all had concerns about the privacy implications arising from sharing patient information in this way. In total, 67% (60/90) considered patient data "moderately safe" on these apps, and 50% (46/90) were concerned the use of these apps was inconsistent with current legislation and policy. Apps were more likely to be used if they were fast, easy to use, had an easy login process, and were already in widespread use.

conclusionsCommunication app use by medical personnel in Victorian hospitals is pervasive. These apps contribute to enhanced communication between medical staff, but their use raises compliance issues, most notably with Australian privacy legislation. Development of privacy-compliant apps such as MedX needs to prioritize a user-friendly interface and market the product as a privacy-compliant comparator to apps previously adapted to health care settings.

Indexed as

communicationcommunications mediahospital communication systemsinformation scienceinterdisciplinary communicationmobile phoneprivacy

Identifiers

PMID29426813
PMCPMC5889814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.