The foundation: Mechanism, prediction, and falsification in Bayesian enactivism: Comment on "Answering Schrödinger's question: A free-energy formulation" by Maxwell James Désormeau Ramstead et al.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Natural language syntax complies with the free-energy principle.Synthese · 2024
   Article
2. Multiscale integration: beyond internalism and externalism.Synthese · 2021
   Article
3. On Markov blankets and hierarchical self-organisation.Journal of theoretical biology · 2020
   Article
4. The hierarchically mechanistic mind: an evolutionary systems theory of the human brain, cognition, and behavior.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Variational neuroethology: Answering further questions: Reply to comments on "Answering Schrödinger's question: A free-energy formulation".2018
• Comment on
  Answering Schrödinger's question: A free-energy formulation.2018

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as