Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29426363›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2018

Effect of heat shock on hot water plumbing microbiota and Legionella pneumophila control.

Pan Ji, William J Rhoads, Marc A Edwards, Amy Pruden

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Flushing as a Control Measure forEnvironmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. VariableMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Environmental Management ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pan JiVia Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
William J RhoadsVia Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Marc A EdwardsVia Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Amy PrudenVia Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. apruden@vt.edu.
Virginia Tech · US

Funding

National Science Foundation CBET Award #1336650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeat shock is a potential control strategy for Legionella pneumophila in hot water plumbing systems. However, it is not consistently effective, with little understanding of its influence on the broader plumbing microbiome. Here, we employed a lab-scale recirculating hot water plumbing rig to compare the pre- and post-"heat shock" (i.e., 40 → 60 → 40 °C) microbiota at distal taps. In addition, we used a second plumbing rig to represent a well-managed system at 60 °C and conducted a "control" sampling at 60 °C, subsequently reducing the temperature to 40 °C to observe the effects on Legionella and the microbiota under a simulated "thermal disruption" scenario.

resultsAccording to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, in the heat shock scenario, there was no significant difference or statistically significant, but small, difference in the microbial community composition at the distal taps pre- versus post-heat shock (both biofilm and water; weighted and unweighted UniFrac distance matrices). While heat shock did lead to decreased total bacteria numbers at distal taps, it did not measurably alter the richness or evenness of the microbiota. Quantitative PCR measurements demonstrated that L. pneumophila relative abundance at distal taps also was not significantly different at 2-month post-heat shock relative to the pre-heat shock condition, while relative abundance of Vermamoeba vermiformis, a known Legionella host, did increase. In the thermal disruption scenario, relative abundance of planktonic L. pneumophila (quantitative PCR data) increased to levels comparable to those observed in the heat shock scenario within 2 months of switching long-term operation at 60 to 40 °C. Overall, water use frequency and water heater temperature set point exhibited a stronger effect than one-time heat shock on the microbial composition and Legionella levels at distal taps.

conclusionsWhile heat shock may be effective for instantaneous Legionella control and reduction in total bacteria numbers, water heater temperature set point and water use frequency are more promising factors for long-term Legionella and microbial community control, illustrating the importance of maintaining consistent elevated temperatures in the system relative to short-term heat shock.

Indexed as

AmoebozoaDNA, BacterialDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalHot TemperatureLegionella pneumophilaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSanitary EngineeringSequence Analysis, DNAWater MicrobiologyDNA, BacterialDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencingDistal tapsHeat shockHot water plumbingOpportunistic pathogens—biofilm

Identifiers

PMID29426363
PMCPMC5807837
OpenAlexW2786440773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.