Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29426355›Full record

Observational studyRadiation oncology (London, England)2018

Role of postoperative radiotherapy in reducing ipsilateral recurrence in DCIS: an observational study of 1048 cases.

Stefanie Corradini, Montserrat Pazos, Stephan Schönecker, Daniel Reitz, Maximilian Niyazi, Ute Ganswindt, Simone Schrodi, Michael Braun, Martin Pölcher, Sven Mahner and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Challenges in Radiotherapy.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Stefanie.corradini@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8709-7252
Montserrat PazosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Stephan SchöneckerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Daniel ReitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Maximilian NiyaziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Ute GanswindtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Simone SchrodiMunich Cancer Registry (MCR) of the Munich Tumour Centre (TZM) at the Institute of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Michael BraunRed Cross Breast Centre, Taxisstr. 3, 80637, Munich, Germany.
Martin PölcherRed Cross Breast Centre, Taxisstr. 3, 80637, Munich, Germany.
Sven MahnerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Centre, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Nadia HarbeckDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Centre, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Jutta EngelMunich Cancer Registry (MCR) of the Munich Tumour Centre (TZM) at the Institute of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DEGerman Red Cross · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery (BCS) in DCIS in a large patient population treated in clinical practice.

methodsData were provided by the population-based Munich Cancer Registry. Between 1998 and 2014, 1048 female patients with diagnosis of DCIS and treated at two Breast Care Centres were included in this observational study. The effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy and variables predicting the use of radiotherapy were retrospectively analysed.

resultsAfter adjusting for age, tumour characteristics and therapies, Cox regression analysis for local recurrence-free survival identified RT as an independent predictor for improved local control (HR: 0.579; 95%CI: 0.384-0.872, p = 0.008). Ten-year cumulative incidence of in-breast recurrences was 20.0% following BCS, compared to 13.6% in patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.012). As an estimate for disease-specific survival, 10-year relative survival was 105.4% for patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy and 101.6% without radiotherapy. On multivariate analysis, postoperative radiotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.526; 95%CI: 0.263-1.052, p = 0.069). Over time, a significant increase of RT was registered: while 1998 only 42.9% of patients received postoperative radiotherapy, the proportion rose to 91.2% in 2014. Women aged < 50 years (OR: 2.559, 95%CI: 1.416-4.625, p < 0.001) or with negative hormone receptor status (OR: 2.625, 95%CI: 1.458-4.728, p = 0.001) or receiving endocrine therapy (OR: 1.762, 95%CI: 1.060-2.927, p = 0.029) were more likely to receive postoperative radiotherapy after BCS.

conclusionsIn conclusion, this study provides insights regarding the adoption and treatment pattern of postoperative RT following BCS for DCIS in a large cohort reflecting "real-life" clinical practice in this setting. Postoperative RT was found to be associated with a reduced risk of ipsilateral recurrence and no survival benefit compared to observation alone.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBreast conserving surgeryDuctal carcinoma in situIn-breast recurrenceLocal controlOutcomeRadiotherapySurvival

Identifiers

PMID29426355
PMCPMC5807793
OpenAlexW2792659089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.