Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29426349›Full record

SynthesisJournal of ovarian research2018

Neurofibroma involving obturator nerve mimicking an adnexal mass: a rare case report and PRISMA-driven systematic review.

Wei-Ting Chao, Chia-Hao Liu, Yi-Jen Chen, Hua-Hsi Wu, Chi-Mu Chuang, Peng-Hui Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of ovarian research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei-Ting ChaoFaculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Hao LiuFaculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Jen ChenFaculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hua-Hsi WuFaculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chi-Mu ChuangFaculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. cmjuang@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6697-712X
Peng-Hui WangFaculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. phwang@vghtpe.gov.tw.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWFu Jen Catholic University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvic masses are a common gynecologic problem, and majority of them are diagnosed as ovarian tumors finally. Sometimes, it is hard to distinguish the origin of these pelvic masses. The following case is a solitary neurofibroma arising from the right-side obturator nerve, which was impressed as a right-side ovarian tumor initially. We reported this case, and also performed a PRISMA-driven systematic review to summary the similar cases in the literature. This review includes image, molecular and pathological findings and outcome of neurofibroma. CASE PRESENTATION: A 33-year-old woman with a regular menstrual period denied any symptoms or signs. During her physical check-up, image examination revealed a right-side heterogeneous pelvic mass; it was suggestive of a complex of right-side ovarian tumor. A provisional diagnosis of retroperitoneal pelvic mass, probably a benign ovarian tumor, was made. Excision of the right-side pelvic mass was performed. We sent the specimens for frozen pathology, which indicated neurofibroma and lipomatous tumor and that the possibility of liposarcoma cannot be excluded. A segment of the obturator nerve was attached to the tumor and was severed. A right-side obturator nerve tear during tumor excision was observed, and a neurosurgeon was consulted for obturator nerve grafting and repair. The patient complained of mild weakness and paresthesia affecting the right leg, and we consulted a rehabilitation doctor for neuron injury. The patient's recovery was uneventful, and she was discharged eight days after the drain was removed. Further rehabilitation treatment was arranged.

conclusionA neurofibroma is an uncommon pelvic retroperitoneal tumor, and it can be misdiagnosed as an adnexal mass. To our knowledge, this is a rare case of a solitary neurofibroma arising from the obturator nerve. It usually does not have any neurological deficit. We present this case to demonstrate that pelvic neurofibroma can be mistaken for an adnexal mass. This fact should be borne in mind during the diagnosis process.

Indexed as

Adnexal DiseasesAdultBiopsyDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ManagementFemaleHistocytochemistryHumansNeurofibromaObturator NervePhysical ExaminationTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyWorkflowNeurofibromaOvarian cancerRetroperitonealSolitary

Identifiers

PMID29426349
PMCPMC5807732
OpenAlexW2794623291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.