Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29426345›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2018

From Kisiizi to Baltimore: cultivating knowledge brokers to support global innovation for community engagement in healthcare.

Chidinma A Ibe, Lopa Basu, Rachel Gooden, Shamsuzzoha B Syed, Viva Dadwal, Lee R Bone, Patti L Ephraim, Christine M Weston, Albert W Wu, Baltimore CONNECT Project Team

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02222909 (Reverse Innovation and Patient Engagement to Improve Quality of Care and Patient Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02222909 nacompletednot on this map

Reverse Innovation and Patient Engagement to Improve Quality of Care and Patient Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2014 to 2015Enrolled6,767ConditionsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Disease, Substance Abuse Disorder, Mental Health DisorderArmsCo-developed IT intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chidinma A IbeCenter for Health Services & Outcomes Research, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. cibe2@jhu.edu.
Lopa BasuJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, 2024 East Monument Street, Room 2-514, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Rachel GoodenWorld Health Organization Service Delivery & Safety Department, Geneva, Switzerland.
Shamsuzzoha B SyedWorld Health Organization Service Delivery & Safety Department, Geneva, Switzerland.
Viva DadwalCentre on Governance, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Lee R BoneDepartment of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Patti L EphraimDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Christine M WestonCenter for Health Services & Outcomes Research, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Albert W WuCenter for Health Services & Outcomes Research, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Baltimore CONNECT Project Team

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (US) 4948World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReverse Innovation has been endorsed as a vehicle for promoting bidirectional learning and information flow between low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries, with the aim of tackling common unmet needs. One such need, which traverses international boundaries, is the development of strategies to initiate and sustain community engagement in health care delivery systems.

objectiveIn this commentary, we discuss the Baltimore "Community-based Organizations Neighborhood Network: Enhancing Capacity Together" Study. This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether or not a community engagement strategy, developed to address patient safety in low- and middle-income countries throughout sub-Saharan Africa, could be successfully applied to create and implement strategies that would link community-based organizations to a local health care system in Baltimore, a city in the United States. Specifically, we explore the trial's activation of community knowledge brokers as the conduit through which community engagement, and innovation production, was achieved. Cultivating community knowledge brokers holds promise as a vehicle for advancing global innovation in the context of health care delivery systems. As such, further efforts to discern the ways in which they may promote the development and dissemination of innovations in health care systems is warranted.

trial registrationTrial Registration Number: NCT02222909 . Trial Register Name: Reverse Innovation and Patient Engagement to Improve Quality of Care and Patient Outcomes (CONNECT). Date of Trial's Registration: August 22, 2014.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationDiffusion of InnovationInternational CooperationKnowledgeBaltimoreDelivery of Health CareHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUgandaBidirectional innovationCommunity engagementCommunity knowledge brokersKnowledge brokerageReverse innovation

Identifiers

PMID29426345
PMCPMC5807858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.