Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29426313›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Urban-rural disparities in health care utilization among Chinese adults from 1993 to 2011.

Jiajia Li, Leiyu Shi, Hailun Liang, Gan Ding, Lingzhong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Study on edge villages based on cross-region healthcare-seeking behavior.International journal of health geographics · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of rurality on health care utilization among Australian residents from 2009 to 2021.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiajia LiSchool of Public Health Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China. lijiajia@sdu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-7458-7682
Leiyu ShiJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. lshi@jhsph.edu.
Hailun LiangJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Gan DingSchool of Public Health Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Lingzhong XuSchool of Public Health Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71303137National Natural Science Foundation of China 71673170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite economic growth and improved health outcomes over the past few decades, China still experiences striking urban-rural health inequalities. Urban and rural residents distinguished by the hukou system may experience profound disparities because of institutional effect. The aim of this study is to estimate trends in urban-rural disparities in self-care, outpatient care, and inpatient care utilization from a perspective of the hukou system.

methodsData were extracted from the seven latest waves of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). We used the hukou system to distinguish between urban and rural residents. Chi-square tests were performed to examine urban-rural gaps in self-care, outpatient care, and inpatient care utilization. Multinomial logistic regression was employed to confirm these disparities and to explore whether the urban-rural gaps have narrowed or widened from 1993 to 2011 once known determinants of utilization are taken into account according to Andersen/Aday's Health Behaviour Model.

resultsThe urban-rural disparities were evident after controlling for confounding variables: urban adults were 3.24 (p < 0.05), 2.23 (p < 0.1), and 4.77 (p < 0.01) times more likely to choose self-care vs. no care, outpatient care vs. no care, and inpatient care vs. no care than their rural counterparts, respectively. The results showed upward trends in self-care, outpatient care, and inpatient care utilization from 2004 to 2011. The urban-rural gaps in health care utilization gradually narrowed during the period of 1993-2011. The hukou distinctions of self-care, outpatient care, and inpatient care in 2011 were only 33.3%, 35.5%, and 9.6% of that in 1993, respectively.

conclusionsAlthough rural residents were underutilizing health care when compared to their urban counterparts, the significant decrements in urban-rural disparities reflect the positive effect of the on-going health system reform in China. To maintain an equitable distribution of health care utilization, policy makers need to be aware of challenges due to aging problems and health expenditure increment.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesPatient Acceptance of Health CareRural PopulationUrban PopulationAdultAgedChinaFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth ExpendituresHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedChinaDynamic trendsHealth care seeking behaviourHukou systemUrban/rural

Identifiers

PMID29426313
PMCPMC5807772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.