Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29426308›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for families of young Indigenous children attending primary care centers; a cross sectional analysis.

Karen M Edmond, Kimberley McAuley, Daniel McAullay, Veronica Matthews, Natalie Strobel, Rhonda Marriott, Ross Bailie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen M EdmondSchool of Medicine, Division Paediatrics, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia. karen.edmond@uwa.edu.au.
Kimberley McAuleySchool of Medicine, Division Paediatrics, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia.
Daniel McAullaySchool of Medicine, Division Paediatrics, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia.
Veronica MatthewsUniversity Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney, 61 Uralba Street, Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia.
Natalie StrobelSchool of Medicine, Division Paediatrics, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia.
Rhonda MarriottSchool of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.
Ross BailieUniversity Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney, 61 Uralba Street, Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia.
University of Western Australia · AULismore Base Hospital · AUMurdoch University · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia APP1060940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe quality of social and emotional wellbeing services for Indigenous families of young children is not known, in many settings especially services provided by primary care centers.

methodsOur primary objective was to assess delivery of social and emotional wellbeing services to the families of young (3-11 months) and older (12-59 months) Indigenous children attending primary care centers. Our secondary objective was to assess if delivery differed by geographic location. Two thousand four hundred sixty-six client files from 109 primary care centers across Australia from 2012 to 2014 were analysed using logistic regression and generalised estimating equations.

resultsThe proportion of families receiving social and emotional wellbeing services ranged from 10.6% (102) (food security) to 74.7% (1216) (assessment of parent child interaction). Seventy one percent (71%, 126) of families received follow up care. Families of children aged 3-11 months (39.5%, 225) were more likely to receive social and emotional wellbeing services (advice about domestic environment, social support, housing condition, child stimulation) than families of children aged 12-59 months (30.0%, 487) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.68 95% CI 1.33 to 2.13). Remote area families (32.6%, 622) received similar services to rural (29.4%, 68) and urban families (44.0%, 22) (aOR 0.64 95% CI 0.29, 1.44).

conclusionsThe families of young Indigenous children appear to receive priority for social and emotional wellbeing care in Australian primary care centers, however many Indigenous families are not receiving services. Improvement in resourcing and support of social and emotional wellbeing services in primary care centers is needed.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesHealth Services, IndigenousPersonal SatisfactionPrimary Health CareAustraliaChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInfantMaleQuality of LifeRural PopulationChild health servicesChild welfareHealth servicesIndigenousQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID29426308
PMCPMC5807859
OpenAlexW2788339678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.