Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29426295›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Preclinical evaluation and reverse phase protein Array-based profiling of PI3K and MEK inhibitors in endometrial carcinoma in vitro.

Ozlem Aslan, Mattia Cremona, Clare Morgan, Lydia W Cheung, Gordon B Mills, Bryan T Hennessy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Precise Immunodetection of PTEN Protein in Human Neoplasia.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Class I Phosphoinositide 3-KinaseInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  13. Modeling Endometrial Cancer: Past, Present, and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ozlem AslanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland. ozlemasl@gmail.com.
Mattia CremonaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Clare MorganDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Lydia W CheungDepartment of Systems Biology, the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Gordon B MillsDepartment of Systems Biology, the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Bryan T HennessyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBeaumont Hospital · IE

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Targeting the PI3K Signaling Pathway in Endometrial CarcinomaP50CA098258 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BODURKA, DIANE · 2003 to 2020
$32.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is the most commonly activated pathway in cancers due to mutations at multiple nodes and loss of PTEN. Furthermore, in endometrial cancer (EC), PI3K and RAS/RAF/MEK/MAPK (RAS/MAPK herein) pathway mutations frequently co-exist. We examined the role of PI3K and RAS/MAPK pathway mutations in determining responsiveness to therapies targeted to these pathways in vitro in EC.

methods13 EC cell lines were profiled for their PI3K pathway and KRAS mutational and PTEN protein status and treated with one MEK- and two PI3K- targeted inhibitors alone and in combination. Expression and phosphorylation of 66 proteins were evaluated by Reverse-Phase-Protein-Array (RPPA) in 6 EC cell lines to identify signalling changes in these pathways in response to therapy.

resultsPTEN protein loss and the absence of any tested pathway mutations are dominant negative predictors of sensitivity to MEK inhibition. KRAS-mutated cells were most sensitive to MEK inhibition, but significantly more resistant to PI3K inhibition than KRAS-wild-type cell lines. Combinations of PI3K and MEK inhibitors showed synergy or additivity in all but two cell lines tested. Treatment of KRAS-mutated cells with PI3K inhibitors and treatment of PTEN-low cells with a MEK inhibitor were most likely to induce activation of MEK/MAPK and AKT, respectively, likely indicative of feedback-loop regulation.

conclusionsMEK inhibition may be a promising treatment modality, not just for ECs with mutated KRAS, but also for those with retained PTEN. Up-regulation of MEK/MAPK signalling by PI3K inhibition, and up-regulation of AKT activation by MEK inhibition may serve as potential biomarkers of likely responsiveness to each inhibitor.

Indexed as

Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMAP Kinase Signaling SystemProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsBiomarkersEndometrial cancerKRASMEK inhibitorPI3K inhibitorPIK3CAProtein signallingPTEN loss

Identifiers

PMID29426295
PMCPMC5807759
OpenAlexW2788554418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.