Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29426065›Full record

ReviewObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2018

A review of machine learning in obesity.

K W DeGregory, P Kuiper, T DeSilvio, J D Pleuss, R Miller, J W Roginski, C B Fisher, D Harness, S Viswanath, S B Heymsfield and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review on Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Obesity Prevention.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Artificial Intelligence Interventions Targeting Obesity-Related Behaviors: Protocol for a Scoping Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

K W DeGregoryDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA.
P KuiperDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA.
T DeSilvioCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J D PleussDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA.
R MillerDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA.
J W RoginskiDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA.
C B FisherDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA.
D HarnessDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA.
S ViswanathCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
S B HeymsfieldPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
I DunganDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA.
D M ThomasDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA.

Funding

MR Fingerprinting and Computerized Decision Support for Prostate CancerR01CA208236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GULANI, VIKAS, PONSKY, LEE EVAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rich sources of obesity-related data arising from sensors, smartphone apps, electronic medical health records and insurance data can bring new insights for understanding, preventing and treating obesity. For such large datasets, machine learning provides sophisticated and elegant tools to describe, classify and predict obesity-related risks and outcomes. Here, we review machine learning methods that predict and/or classify such as linear and logistic regression, artificial neural networks, deep learning and decision tree analysis. We also review methods that describe and characterize data such as cluster analysis, principal component analysis, network science and topological data analysis. We introduce each method with a high-level overview followed by examples of successful applications. The algorithms were then applied to National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to demonstrate methodology, utility and outcomes. The strengths and limitations of each method were also evaluated. This summary of machine learning algorithms provides a unique overview of the state of data analysis applied specifically to obesity.

Indexed as

Machine LearningObesityAlgorithmsHumansLogistic ModelsNeural Networks, ComputerNutrition SurveysDeep learningmachine learningNational Health and Nutrition Examination Surveytopological data analysis

Identifiers

PMID29426065
PMCPMC8176949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.