Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29425885›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2018

Scoping the scope: endoscopic evaluation of endoscope working channels with a new high-resolution inspection endoscope (with video).

Monique T Barakat, Mohit Girotra, Robert J Huang, Subhas Banerjee

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effects of different drying temperatures and times on the drying efficiency in reprocessing of flexible endoscopes.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Recent Advances in Endoscope Disinfection: Where Do We Stand in the COVID era?Techniques and innovations in gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Duodenoscope-associated infections: a review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monique T BarakatDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Mohit GirotraDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Robert J HuangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Subhas BanerjeeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

TRAINING GRANT IN ACADEMIC GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007056 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Natalie J. Torok · 1986 to 2026
$6.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsOutbreaks of transmission of infection related to endoscopy despite reported adherence to reprocessing guidelines warrant scrutiny of all potential contributing factors. Recent reports from ambulatory surgery centers indicated widespread significant occult damage within endoscope working channels, raising concerns regarding the potential detrimental impact of this damage on the adequacy of endoscope reprocessing.

methodsWe inspected working channels of all 68 endoscopes at our academic institution using a novel flexible inspection endoscope. Inspections were recorded and videos reviewed by 3 investigators to evaluate and rate channel damage and/or debris. Working channel rinsates were obtained from all endoscopes, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence was measured.

resultsOverall endoscope working channel damage was rated as minimal and/or mild and was consistent with expected wear and tear (median 1.59 on our 5-point scale). Our predominant findings included superficial scratches (98.5%) and scratches with adherent peel (76.5%). No channel perforations, stains, or burns were detected. The extent of damage was not predicted by endoscope age. Minor punctate debris was common, and a few small drops of fluid were noted in 42.6% of endoscopes after reprocessing and drying. The presence of residual fluid predicted higher ATP bioluminescence values. The presence of visualized working channel damage or debris was not associated with elevated ATP bioluminescence values.

conclusionThe flexible inspection endoscope enables high-resolution imaging of endoscope working channels and offers endoscopy units an additional modality for endoscope surveillance, potentially complementing bacterial cultures and ATP values. Our study, conducted in a busy academic endoscopy unit, indicated predominately mild damage to endoscope working channels, which did not correlate with elevated ATP values.

Indexed as

EndoscopesEquipment FailureDisinfectionEquipment Failure AnalysisEquipment ReuseHumansObserver Variation

Identifiers

PMID29425885
PMCPMC6078831
OpenAlexW2787499211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.