ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2018
Single Fluid-Filled Intragastric Balloon Safe and Effective for Inducing Weight Loss in a Real-World Population.
Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04306445 (The Effect of a Gas-filled Intragastric Balloon or Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Weight Loss Compared With a Meal Replacement Weight Loss Program on Gastric Emptying, Hormonal Adaptation to Weight Loss, and Hunger), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of a Gas-filled Intragastric Balloon or Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Weight Loss Compared With a Meal Replacement Weight Loss Program on Gastric Emptying, Hormonal Adaptation to Weight Loss, and Hunger
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Intragastric Balloon Significantly Improves Metabolic Parameters at 6 Months: a Meta-Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Contamination of single fluid-filled intragastric balloons with orogastric fluid is not associated with hyperinflation: an ex-vivo study and systematic review of literature.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Intragastric Balloon (IGB) in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD): a Comprehensive Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy of Intragastric Balloons for Weight Loss in Overweight and Obese Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Obesity surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Fluid-Filled Versus Gas-Filled Intragastric Balloons as Obesity Interventions: a Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.Obesity surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Adjunctive Semaglutide in Patients Undergoing Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss: 12-Month Prospective Comparative Study.Obesity surgery · 2025Trial
- Intragastric Balloon Placement Induces Significant Metabolic and Histologic Improvement in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2021Trial
- Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus intragastric balloon insertion as bridge-to-surgery procedures for patients with BMI ≥50 kg/mTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Endoscopic tips for intragastric balloon use for obesity: what you need to know.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024Review
- Spontaneous Intragastric Balloon Hyperinflation: Two Cases and Outcomes.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Update on Endoscopic Treatments for Obesity.Current obesity reports · 2024Review
- Article
- Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- The Swallowable Intragastric Balloon Combined with Lifestyle Coaching: Short-Term Results of a Safe and Effective Weight Loss Treatment for People Living with Overweight and Obesity.Obesity surgery · 2023Article
- Current treatment landscape for obesity in Singapore.Singapore medical journal · 2023Review
- Advances in endobariatrics: past, present, and future.Gastroenterology report · 2023Review
- Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies for Liver Disease: Mechanisms, Benefits, and Associated Risks.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2022Review
- Mixed Fungal Biofilms: From Mycobiota to Devices, a New Challenge on Clinical Practice.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Impact of preoperative weight loss achieved by gastric balloon on peri- and postoperative outcomes of bariatric surgery in super-obese patients: a retrospective matched-pair analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Article
- Fluid-filled intragastric balloons are an effective and safe weight loss option across BMI and age ranges.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsThe Orbera intragastric balloon (OIB) is a single fluid-filled intragastric balloon approved for the induction of weight loss and treatment of obesity. However, little is known about the effectiveness and safety of the OIB outside clinical trials, and since approval, the Food and Drug Administration has issued warnings to health care providers about risk of balloon hyperinflation requiring early removal, pancreatitis, and death. We analyzed data on patients who have received the OIB since its approval to determine its safety, effectiveness, and tolerance in real-world clinical settings.
methodsWe performed a postregulatory approval study of the safety and efficacy of the OIB, and factors associated with intolerance and response. We collected data from the Mayo Clinic's database of patient demographics, outcomes of OIB placement (weight loss, weight-related comorbidities), technical aspects of insertion and removal, and adverse events associated with the device and/or procedure, from 8 centers (3 academic, 5 private, 4 surgeons, and 4 gastroenterologists). Our final analysis comprised 321 patients (mean age, 48.1 ± 11.9 y; 80% female; baseline body mass index, 37.6 ± 6.9). Exploratory multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of success and early balloon removal. Primary effectiveness outcomes were percentage of total body weight lost at 3, 6, and 9 months. Primary and secondary safety outcomes were rates of early balloon removal, periprocedural complications, dehydration episodes requiring intravenous infusion, balloon migration, balloon deflation or hyperinflation, pancreatitis, or other complications.
resultsFour patients had contraindications for placement at the time of endoscopy. The balloon was safely removed in all instances with an early removal rate (before 6 months) in 16.7% of patients, at a median of 8 weeks after placement (range, 1-6 mo). Use of selective serotonin or serotonin-norepinephrine re-uptake inhibitors at the time of balloon placement was associated with increased odds of removal before 6 months (odds ratio, 3.92; 95% CI, 1.24-12.41). Total body weight lost at 3 months was 8.5% ± 4.9% (n = 204), at 6 months was 11.8% ± 7.5% (n = 199), and at 9 months was 13.3% ± 10% (n = 47). At 6 months, total body weight losses of 5%, 10%, and 15% were achieved by 88%, 62%, and 31% of patients, respectively. Number of follow-up visits and weight loss at 3 months were associated with increased weight loss at 6 months (β = 0.5 and 1.2, respectively) (P < .05). Mean levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, and hemoglobin A1c, as well as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, were significantly improved at 6 months after OIB placement (P < .05).
conclusionsIn an analysis of a database of patients who received endoscopic placement of the OIB, we found it to be safe, effective at inducing weight loss, and to reduce obesity-related comorbidities in a real-world clinical population. Rates of early removal (before 8 weeks) did not differ significantly between clinical trials and the real-world population, but were affected by use of medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.