Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29425712›Full record

ArticleReproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)2018

A utilitarian comparison of two alcohol use biomarkers with self-reported drinking history collected in antenatal clinics.

Philip A May, Julie M Hasken, Marlene M De Vries, Anna-Susan Marais, Julie M Stegall, Daniel Marsden, Charles D H Parry, Soraya Seedat, Barbara Tabachnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Philip A MayUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Nutrition Research Institute, United States; Stellenbosch University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa. Electronic address: philip_may@unc.edu.
Julie M HaskenUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Nutrition Research Institute, United States.
Marlene M De VriesStellenbosch University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa.
Anna-Susan MaraisStellenbosch University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa.
Julie M StegallUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Nutrition Research Institute, United States.
Daniel MarsdenFulbright U.S. Student, 2015, Stellenbosch University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa.
Charles D H ParryStellenbosch University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, 7501, South Africa.
Soraya SeedatStellenbosch University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa.
Barbara TabachnickCalifornia State University, Northridge, CA 90802, United States.
Stellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCalifornia State University, Northridge · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZA

Funding

Trajectory of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) Across the Lifespan: Continuing Prevention and Longitudinal EpidemiologyU01AA015134 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MAY, PHILIP ALAN · 2009 to 2018
$7.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA015134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlcohol use is reported accurately among pregnant women in some populations.

methodsSelf-reported alcohol use via the AUDIT and 90-day recall for 193 women from antenatal clinics was compared to biomarker results: phosphatidylethanol (PEth) from bloodspots and ethyl glucuronide (EtG) in fingernails.

resultsAUDIT was positive for 67.9% of respondents, and 65.3% directly reported drinking. Individual biomarkers detected less drinking (PEth = 57.0%, EtG = 38.9%) than self-report. But 64.8% had drinking-positive values (>8 ng) on one or both biomarkers, which was not significantly different from self-report. Biomarkers indicated that 3.1% -6.8% of drinkers denied drinking. Combined biomarker sensitivity was 95% -80% and specificity 49% -76% for drinking in the previous 7-90 days. Combined biomarker results have their best yield (89.6%) and accuracy (78.8%) when measuring 90 day drinking.

conclusionsWomen reported their alcohol use accurately, and the combined use of PEth and EtG is supported.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAmbulatory Care FacilitiesBiomarkersFemaleGlucuronatesGlycerophospholipidsHumansNailsPregnancyPrenatal CareSelf ReportBiomarkersethyl glucuronideGlucuronatesGlycerophospholipidsphosphatidylethanolAlcoholAUDITBiomarkers of alcohol useEthyl glucuronide (EtG)Phosphatidylethanol (PEth)Quantity and frequency of drinkingSelf-report of alcohol use

Identifiers

PMID29425712
PMCPMC5878131
OpenAlexW2794029305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.