Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29425311›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Are Nonsense Alleles of Drosophila melanogaster Genes under Any Selection?

Nadezhda A Potapova, Maria A Andrianova, Georgii A Bazykin, Alexey S Kondrashov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadezhda A PotapovaInstitute of Information Transmission Problems (Kharkevich Institute) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Maria A AndrianovaInstitute of Information Transmission Problems (Kharkevich Institute) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Georgii A BazykinInstitute of Information Transmission Problems (Kharkevich Institute) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Alexey S KondrashovDepartment of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A gene which carries a bona fide loss-of-function mutation effectively becomes a functionless pseudogene, free from selective constraint. However, there is a number of molecular mechanisms that may lead to at least a partial preservation of the function of genes carrying even drastic alleles. We performed a direct measurement of the strength of negative selection acting on nonsense alleles of protein-coding genes in the Zambian population of Drosophila melanogaster. Within those exons that carry nonsense mutations, negative selection, assayed by the ratio of missense over synonymous nucleotide diversity levels, appears to be absent, consistent with total loss of function. In other exons of nonsense alleles, negative selection was deeply relaxed but likely not completely absent, and the per site number of missense alleles declined significantly with the distance from the premature stop codon. This pattern may be due to alternative splicing which preserves function of some isoforms of nonsense alleles of genes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAllelesAlternative SplicingAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCodon, NonsenseDrosophila melanogasterExonsGenetics, PopulationPseudogenesSelection, GeneticCodon, Nonsense

Identifiers

PMID29425311
PMCPMC5888714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.