Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29425277›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2018

Global analysis of an exponential model of cell proliferation for estimation of cell cycle duration in the root apical meristem of angiosperms.

Natalia V Zhukovskaya, Elena I Bystrova, Joseph G Dubrovsky, Victor B Ivanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The botanical multiverse of Peter Barlow.Communicative & integrative biology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natalia V ZhukovskayaDepartment of Root Physiology, Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Elena I BystrovaDepartment of Root Physiology, Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Joseph G DubrovskyInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Victor B IvanovDepartment of Root Physiology, Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Information on cell cycle duration (T) in the root apical meristem (RAM) provides insight into root growth, development and evolution. We have previously proposed a simple method for evaluating T based on the dynamics of root growth (V), the number of cells in the RAM (Nm) and the length of fully elongated cells (l), which we named the rate-of-cell-production (RCP) method. Here, a global analysis was performed to confirm the reliability of this method in a range of angiosperm species and to assess the advantages of this approach. Methods: We measured V, Nm and l from live or fixed cleared primary roots of seedlings or adventitious roots of bulbs and used this information to estimate the average T values in 73 angiosperm species via the RCP method. The results were then compared with published data obtained using the classical but laborious and time-consuming 3H-thymidine method. Key Results: In most species examined, the T values obtained by the RCP method were nearly identical to those obtained by the 3H-thymidine method. Conclusions: The global analysis demonstrated that the relationship between the variables V, Nm and l in roots in the steady state of growth is correctly described by the equation T = (ln2 Nm l)V-1. Thus, the RCP method enables cell cycle duration in the RAM to be rapidly and accurately determined. This method can be performed using live or fixed roots for each individual cell type. The simplicity of the approach suggests that it will be widely used in phenomics, evolutionary ecology and other plant biology studies.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell ProliferationMagnoliopsidaMeristemPlant Roots

Identifiers

PMID29425277
PMCPMC6215031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.