ArticleAnnals of botany2018
Global analysis of an exponential model of cell proliferation for estimation of cell cycle duration in the root apical meristem of angiosperms.
Article in Annals of botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Assessment of Silver Nanoparticles on Plant Growth and Cytogenotoxicity UsingJournal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
- Cell cycle time in the root apical meristem of angiosperms and its dependence on holoploid DNA content.Planta · 2024Article
- The hidden half comes into the spotlight: Peeking inside the black box of root developmental phases.Plant communications · 2022Review
- Cellular Growth in Aerial Roots Differs From That in Typical Substrate Roots.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- A perspective on cell proliferation kinetics in the root apical meristem.Journal of experimental botany · 2021Review
- Interkingdom Comparison of Threonine Metabolism for Stem Cell Maintenance in Plants and Animals.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Lateral Root Primordium Morphogenesis in Angiosperms.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Review
- The botanical multiverse of Peter Barlow.Communicative & integrative biology · 2019Review
- From dangerous branches to urban banyan: Facilitating aerial root growth of Ficus rubiginosa.PloS one · 2019Article
- Week-long imaging of cell divisions in the Arabidopsis root meristem.Plant methods · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Information on cell cycle duration (T) in the root apical meristem (RAM) provides insight into root growth, development and evolution. We have previously proposed a simple method for evaluating T based on the dynamics of root growth (V), the number of cells in the RAM (Nm) and the length of fully elongated cells (l), which we named the rate-of-cell-production (RCP) method. Here, a global analysis was performed to confirm the reliability of this method in a range of angiosperm species and to assess the advantages of this approach. Methods: We measured V, Nm and l from live or fixed cleared primary roots of seedlings or adventitious roots of bulbs and used this information to estimate the average T values in 73 angiosperm species via the RCP method. The results were then compared with published data obtained using the classical but laborious and time-consuming 3H-thymidine method. Key Results: In most species examined, the T values obtained by the RCP method were nearly identical to those obtained by the 3H-thymidine method. Conclusions: The global analysis demonstrated that the relationship between the variables V, Nm and l in roots in the steady state of growth is correctly described by the equation T = (ln2 Nm l)V-1. Thus, the RCP method enables cell cycle duration in the RAM to be rapidly and accurately determined. This method can be performed using live or fixed roots for each individual cell type. The simplicity of the approach suggests that it will be widely used in phenomics, evolutionary ecology and other plant biology studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.