Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29425221›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with occult biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: Detection rate, impact on management and adequacy of impact. A prospective multicentre study.

Quentin Gillebert, Virginie Huchet, Caroline Rousseau, Alexandre Cochet, Pierre Olivier, Frédéric Courbon, Eric Gontier, Valérie Nataf, Sona Balogova, Jean-Noël Talbot and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Phase III Study ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  3. Comparison ofBMC medical imaging · 2020
    Trial
  4. Incidental Detection of Sarcomatoid Lung Cancer by [Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2023
    Article
  5. Detection of recurrence sites usingProstate international · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Quentin GillebertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris & Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Virginie HuchetDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris & Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Caroline RousseauNuclear Medicine Unit, ICO Cancer Center, Saint Herblain, France.
Alexandre CochetDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Pierre OlivierDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Brabois, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Frédéric CourbonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France.
Eric GontierDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, HIA Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France.
Valérie NatafDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris & Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Sona BalogovaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris & Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5040-9504
Jean-Noël TalbotDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris & Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
other ICHOROPRO investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo prospectively evaluate the clinical impact and the diagnostic performance of FCH-PET/CT in patients with occult biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND

methodsResults of 179 patients (mean PSA = 7.5ng/mL) with negative/inconclusive results of pelvic-MRI and of bone-scintigraphy were analysed. To determine the impact of FCH-PET/CT on diagnostic thinking and on patient management, the referring physicians prospectively filled-in a 1st and 2nd questionnaire related to patient's planned management before and after FCH-PET/CT. Based on data from a 6-month follow-up after FCH-PET/CT, an independent assessor blinded to results of FCH-PET/CT determined the adequacy of management changes motivated by FCH-PET/CT.

resultsFCH-PET/CT localised foci evocative of recurrent PCa in 59% (105/179) of patients. Results of FCH-PET/CT motivated a change in scheduled patient management in 56% (100/179) of patients; which was considered as adequate in 89% (89/100) of patients. FCH-PET/CT also led to the detection of lung cancer in two patients.

conclusionFCH PET/CT is a powerful tool to localise the sites of occult biochemical recurrence of PCa, leading to an adequate management change in half of patients.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingAgedAged, 80 and overCholineFluorine RadioisotopesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesProstatic NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCholineFluorine Radioisotopesfluorocholine

Identifiers

PMID29425221
PMCPMC5806856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.