Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29425218›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Body size estimation of self and others in females varying in BMI.

Anne Thaler, Michael N Geuss, Simone C Mölbert, Katrin E Giel, Stephan Streuber, Javier Romero, Michael J Black, Betty J Mohler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Real Ideal: Misestimation of Body Mass Index.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne ThalerMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3397-2087
Michael N GeussMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Simone C MölbertMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Katrin E GielDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Stephan StreuberMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.
Javier RomeroMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.
Michael J BlackMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.
Betty J MohlerMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics · DEMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous literature suggests that a disturbed ability to accurately identify own body size may contribute to overweight. Here, we investigated the influence of personal body size, indexed by body mass index (BMI), on body size estimation in a non-clinical population of females varying in BMI. We attempted to disentangle general biases in body size estimates and attitudinal influences by manipulating whether participants believed the body stimuli (personalized avatars with realistic weight variations) represented their own body or that of another person. Our results show that the accuracy of own body size estimation is predicted by personal BMI, such that participants with lower BMI underestimated their body size and participants with higher BMI overestimated their body size. Further, participants with higher BMI were less likely to notice the same percentage of weight gain than participants with lower BMI. Importantly, these results were only apparent when participants were judging a virtual body that was their own identity (Experiment 1), but not when they estimated the size of a body with another identity and the same underlying body shape (Experiment 2a). The different influences of BMI on accuracy of body size estimation and sensitivity to weight change for self and other identity suggests that effects of BMI on visual body size estimation are self-specific and not generalizable to other bodies.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexBody SizeSelf ConceptAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29425218
PMCPMC5806871
OpenAlexW2790550496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.