Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29425203›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Neutralization of antibody-enhanced dengue infection by VIS513, a pan serotype reactive monoclonal antibody targeting domain III of the dengue E protein.

Yadunanda Budigi, Eugenia Z Ong, Luke N Robinson, Li Ching Ong, Kirk J Rowley, Alexander Winnett, Hwee Cheng Tan, Sven Hobbie, Zachary Shriver, Gregory J Babcock and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Dengue virus infection.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Dengue is Still a Complicated Disease.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Dengue encephalitis: what's new?Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Dengue: Update on Clinically Relevant Therapeutic Strategies and Vaccines.Current treatment options in infectious diseases · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yadunanda BudigiVisterra Singapore International Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Eugenia Z OngExperimental Therapeutics Centre, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2187-7058
Luke N RobinsonVisterra Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Li Ching OngDepartment of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Kirk J RowleyVisterra Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Alexander WinnettVisterra Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Hwee Cheng TanProgram in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Sven HobbieVisterra Singapore International Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Zachary ShriverVisterra Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Gregory J BabcockVisterra Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sylvie AlonsoDepartment of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Eng Eong OoiInfectious Diseases Interdisciplinary Research Group, Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore, Singapore.
Visterra (United States) · USNational University of Singapore · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGSingapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue virus (DENV) infection imposes enormous health and economic burden worldwide with no approved treatment. Several small molecules, including lovastatin, celgosivir, balapiravir and chloroquine have been tested for potential anti-dengue activity in clinical trials; none of these have demonstrated a protective effect. Recently, based on identification and characterization of cross-serotype neutralizing antibodies, there is increasing attention on the potential for dengue immunotherapy. Here, we tested the ability of VIS513, an engineered cross-neutralizing humanized antibody targeting the DENV E protein domain III, to overcome antibody-enhanced infection and high but brief viremia, which are commonly encountered in dengue patients, in various in vitro and in vivo models. We observed that VIS513 efficiently neutralizes DENV at clinically relevant viral loads or in the presence of enhancing levels of DENV immune sera. Single therapeutic administration of VIS513 in mouse models of primary infection or lethal secondary antibody-enhanced infection, reduces DENV titers and protects from lethal infection. Finally, VIS513 administration does not readily lead to resistance, either in cell culture systems or in animal models of dengue infection. The findings suggest that rapid viral reduction during acute DENV infection with a monoclonal antibody is feasible.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralCell LineChlorocebus aethiopsCross ReactionsDengueDengue VirusDisease Models, AnimalEpitopesFemaleHumansImmune SeraImmunotherapyAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralEpitopesImmune SeraRecombinant ProteinsViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29425203
PMCPMC5823465
OpenAlexW2786145011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.