Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29425146›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Nanoparticle-Based Strategies to Treat Neuro-Inflammation.

Rémy Poupot, Dylan Bergozza, Séverine Fruchon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A Review of Hemp as Food and Nutritional Supplement.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The potency of chitosan-basedVeterinary world · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Multivalent nanosystems: targeting monocytes/macrophages.International journal of nanomedicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rémy PoupotINSERM, U1043, CNRS, U5282, Université de Toulouse, UPS, Centre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse-Purpan, F-31300 Toulouse, France. remy.poupot@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-1396-8531
Dylan BergozzaINSERM, U1043, CNRS, U5282, Université de Toulouse, UPS, Centre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse-Purpan, F-31300 Toulouse, France. dylan.bergozza@univ-tlse3.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9382-0689
Séverine FruchonINSERM, U1043, CNRS, U5282, Université de Toulouse, UPS, Centre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse-Purpan, F-31300 Toulouse, France. severine.fruchon@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9382-0689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuro-inflammation is a pivotal physio-pathological feature of brain disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases. As such, it is a relevant therapeutic target against which drugs have to be proposed. Targeting neuro-inflammation implies crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) to reach the Central Nervous System (CNS). Engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) are promising candidates to carry and deliver drugs to the CNS by crossing the BBB. There are several strategies to design ENPs intended for crossing through the BBB. Herein, we first put nanotechnologies back in their historical context and introduce neuro-inflammation and its consequences in terms of public health. In a second part, we explain how ENPs can get access to the brain and review this area by highlighting recent papers in the field. Finally, after pointing out potential guidelines for preclinical studies involving ENPs, we conclude by opening the debate on the questions of nanosafety and toxicity of these ENPs and in particular on ecotoxicity related to regulatory issues and public concerns.

Indexed as

blood-brain barriernanoparticlesnanosafetynanotechnologyneuro-inflammation

Identifiers

PMID29425146
PMCPMC5848967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.