Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29425127›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

German Consumers' Attitude towards Selenium-Biofortified Apples and Acceptance of Related Nutrition and Health Claims.

Lena Wortmann, Ulrich Enneking, Diemo Daum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Applications of Genomic Tools in Plant Breeding: Crop Biofortification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Consumer Acceptance toward Functional Foods: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lena WortmannOsnabrueck University of Applied Sciences, Am Kruempel 31, 49090 Osnabrueck, Germany. lena.wortmann@hs-osnabrueck.de.
Ulrich EnnekingOsnabrueck University of Applied Sciences, Am Kruempel 31, 49090 Osnabrueck, Germany. u.enneking@hs-osnabrueck.de.
Diemo DaumOsnabrueck University of Applied Sciences, Am Kruempel 31, 49090 Osnabrueck, Germany. d.daum@hs-osnabrueck.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigates consumers' acceptance of Se-biofortified apples, as well as Se health and nutrition claims that have been approved by the European Commission. Despite indications that such statements are more likely to be accepted if the carrier product itself has a healthy image, unprocessed fruits biofortified with Se have not been investigated in this context yet. Apples as the most frequently-consumed type of fresh fruit in Germany may offer the potential to improve the Se status of consumers when the produce is enriched with Se. Therefore, an online survey of 356 German adults was conducted to analyze different aspects that could affect the perception of and preference for the proposed product concept by consumers. The findings indicate a moderate acceptance of Se-biofortified apples, as well as of Se health and nutrition claims among the participants. Additional information about beneficial health effects of Se had a significant impact on consumer acceptance. People who regularly eat convenience food and prefer to buy apples at supermarkets were particularly attracted by the product idea. In conclusion, the results of the study indicate good prospects for a successful introduction of Se-rich apples in the German food market, if the produce is advertised with approved health and nutrition claims.

Indexed as

BiofortificationConsumer BehaviorFood PreferencesFruitHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionMalusAdultDiet, HealthyFemaleFocus GroupsFood LabelingFunctional FoodGermanyHumansInternetSeleniumapplesconsumer acceptancefunctional foodnutrition and health claimsseleniumsupplements

Identifiers

PMID29425127
PMCPMC5852766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.