Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29423923›Full record

ArticleTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society2018

Stewardship opportunities in viral pneumonia: Why not the immunocompromised?

Nicholas J Mercuro, Rachel M Kenney, Linoj Samuel, Robert J Tibbetts, George J Alangaden, Susan L Davis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Molecular Testing for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections: Clinical and Diagnostic Recommendations From the IDSA's Diagnostics Committee.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  4. Use of Procalcitonin and a Respiratory Polymerase Chain Reaction Panel to Reduce Antibiotic Use via an Electronic Medical Record Alert.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Stewardship opportunities in viral pneumonia: Why not the immunocompromised?Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas J MercuroDepartment of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Rachel M KenneyDepartment of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Linoj SamuelDepartment of Pathology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Robert J TibbettsDepartment of Pathology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
George J AlangadenDepartment of Infectious Disease, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Susan L DavisDepartment of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7521-9486
Henry Ford Health System · USEugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial management of viral pneumonia has proven to be a challenge in hospitalized immunocompromised patients. A host of factors contribute to the dilemma, such as diagnostic uncertainty, lack of organism identification, and clinical status of the patient. Respiratory virus panel (RVP) use was compared between 131 immunocompromised patients who received send-out (n = 56) vs in-house (n = 75) testing. Antimicrobial optimization interventions consisted of antiviral addition/discontinuation, antibiotic discontinuation/de-escalation, or modification of immunosuppressive regimen. After implementation of an in-house test with audit and feedback, turnaround time of the RVP was reduced from 46.7 to 5.5 hours (P < .001) and time to intervention was reduced from 52.1 to 13.9 hours (P < .001), yet the frequency of antimicrobial optimization interventions was unchanged (30.7% vs 35.7%). Differences were not observed in duration of empiric antibiotic therapy or length of stay. The overall discontinuation rate for patients tested with a RVP was low (4.6%), and those with positive RVP (n = 43) had antibiotics stopped in 14% of cases. Bacterial pneumonia coinfection was confirmed in 2 patients. Further systematic efforts should be taken to reduce antibiotic use in viral pneumonia and identify the major barriers in the immunocompromised population.

Indexed as

Immunocompromised HostAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipBacterial InfectionsDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTransplant RecipientsAnti-Bacterial AgentsImmunosuppressive Agentsimmunocompromisedrapid diagnosticrespiratory virus panelstewardshipviral pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID29423923
PMCPMC7169875
OpenAlexW2793193490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.