Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29423767›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2018

Patient understanding of discharge instructions in the emergency department: do different patients need different approaches?

Hasan Sheikh, Aleksandar Brezar, Agata Dzwonek, Lawrence Yau, Lisa A Calder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rethinking Postdischarge Intervention Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ED-Explain: Personalized Video Instructions for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2026
    Article
  10. Development and validation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Older adult care Transitions from the Emergency Department (PROM-OTED) tool.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tools to improve discharge equity: Protocol for the pilot TIDE trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Identifying Facilitators and Inhibitors of Shared Understanding: An Ethnography of Diagnosis Communication in Acute Medical Settings.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hasan SheikhDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. hasanmsheikh@gmail.com.
Aleksandar BrezarFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Agata DzwonekFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lawrence YauFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa A CalderOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated that patients have poor understanding of the discharge instructions provided from the emergency department (ED). The aims of this study are to determine if patient factors, such as income and level of education, correlate with patient understanding of discharge instructions and to explore if different patient populations prefer different resources for receiving discharge instructions.

methodsWe conducted live observations of physicians providing discharge instructions in the ED to 100 patients followed by a patient survey to determine their understanding in four domains (diagnosis, treatment plan, follow-up instructions, and return to ED (RTED) instructions) and collect patient demographics. We enrolled patients over the age of 18 being discharged home. We excluded non-English- or French-speaking patients and those with significant psychiatric history or cognitive impairment. We performed a two-way ANOVA analysis of patient factors and patient understanding.

resultsWe found that patients had poor understanding of discharge instructions, ranging from 24.0% having poor understanding of their follow-up plan to 64.0% for RTED instructions. Almost half (42%) of patients did not receive complete discharge instructions. Lower income was correlated with a significant decrease in patient understanding of discharge diagnosis (p = 0.01) and RTED instructions (p = 0.04). Patients who did not complete high school trended towards lower levels of understanding of their diagnosis and treatment plan (p = 0.06). Lower income patients had a preference for receiving a follow-up phone call by a nurse, while higher income patients preferred online resources.

conclusionsLower income patients and those who have not completed high school are at a higher risk of poor understanding discharge instructions. As new technological solutions emerge to aid patient understanding of discharge instructions, our study suggests they may not aid those who are at the highest risk of failing to understand their instructions.

Identifiers

PMID29423767
PMCPMC5805670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.