Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29423759›Full record

ReviewCancer causes & control : CCC2018

Geospatial approaches to cancer control and population sciences at the United States cancer centers.

Robert W Korycinski, Bethany L Tennant, Michelle A Cawley, Bonny Bloodgood, April Y Oh, David Berrigan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Practical Strategy of Informatics, Geospatial Mapping, Geodemographic Segmentation, and Regression Analyses to Address Nonadherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Renewed Focus on Health Disparities in the Year 2020: Reexamining Geospatial Disparities.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert W KorycinskiDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. robert.korycinski@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-2130
Bethany L TennantICF, Fairfax, VA, 22031, USA.
Michelle A CawleyICF, Fairfax, VA, 22031, USA.
Bonny BloodgoodICF, Fairfax, VA, 22031, USA.
April Y OhDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
David BerriganDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
ICF International (United States) · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Cancer Institute · MY

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGeospatial, contextual, and multilevel research is integral to cancer prevention and control. NCI-designated Cancer Centers are at the forefront of cancer research; therefore, this paper sought to review the geospatial, contextual, and multilevel research at these cancer centers.

methodsInvestigators used PubMed and Web of Science to compile geospatial publications from 1971 to February 2016 with cancer center-affiliated authors. Relevant abstracts were pulled and classified by six geospatial approaches, eight geospatial scales, and eight cancer sites.

resultsThe searches identified 802 geospatial, contextual, and multilevel publications with authors affiliated at 60 of the 68 NCI-designated Cancer Centers. Over 90% were published after 2000. Five cancer centers accounted for approximately 50% of total publications, and 30 cancer centers accounted for over 85% of total publications. Publications covered all geospatial approaches and scales to varying degrees, and 90% dealt with cancer.

conclusionsThe NCI-designated Cancer Center network is increasingly pursuing geospatial, contextual, and multilevel cancer research, although many cancer centers still conduct limited to no research in this area. Expanding geospatial efforts to research programs across all cancer centers will further enrich cancer prevention and control. Similar reviews may benefit other domestic and international cancer research institutions.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesBiomedical ResearchHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)NeoplasmsSpatial AnalysisUnited StatesCancerContextualGeographyGeospatialMultilevelNeighborhood

Identifiers

PMID29423759
PMCPMC5893134
OpenAlexW2792771655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.