ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2018
Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03833258 (A Randomised Controlled Trial of the Impact on Function of an Unrestricted Rehabilitation Pathway of no Precautions Following Total Hip Replacement), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised Controlled Trial of the Impact on Function of an Unrestricted Rehabilitation Pathway of no Precautions Following Total Hip Replacement
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of minimum important changes for generic multi-attribute utility instruments and recommendations for their estimation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025Pooled it
- Preoperative predictors of health-related quality of life changes (EQ-5D and EQ VAS) after total hip and knee replacement: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021Pooled it
- Generalizability of the Progressive Resistance Training versus Total Hip Arthroplasty (PROHIP) trial: a cross-sectional study of 402 patients in Denmark.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Trial
- Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-10 Global Health and EQ-5D questionnaires in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.The bone & joint journal · 2019Trial
- Short-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty at 12-month follow-up: a prospective, multicenter, concomitant comparison to conventional total knee arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Functional and quality-of-life outcomes after metal-on-polyethylene articulating spacer implantation for periprosthetic knee infection: a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected cohort.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Observational
- Quality of life before and during the COVID-19 pandemic for people undergoing hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty-nationwide results from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.International orthopaedics · 2026Observational
- Article
- The Influence of the Type of Metal-on-Metal Hip Endoprosthesis on the Clinical, Biochemical, and Oxidative Balance Status-A Comparison of Resurfacing and Metaphyseal Implants.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Validity, reliability, responsiveness and interpretability of the EFAS-DK PROM: an observational cohort study of Danish speaking foot and ankle patients.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Observational
- Association of self-efficacy, risk attitudes, and time preferences with health-related quality of life and functioning after total hip or knee replacement - Results of the MobilE-TRA 2 cohort.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Observational
- Effects of Integrating Pain Coping Strategies into Occupational Therapy After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Parallel Mixed-Method Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Two Program Examples Measuring Health Status in Primary Care: An Observational Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Validation of the hip disability osteoarthritis outcome Score-12 shortform in a German cohort.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- How Does the New Australian EQ-5D-5L Value Set Impact Utility Scores? Analysis of Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024Article
- Effect of an exercise intervention targeting hip strengthening in patients undergoing revision total hip replacement-A study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2024Article
- Hip-specific and generic patient-reported outcome measure scores after primary hip replacement are associated with early revision surgery: a national registry study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Early- to Mid-Term Review of a Prospective, Multi-Center, International, Outcomes Study of an Anatomically Designed Implant with Posterior-Stabilized Bearing in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- The use of EQ-5D-5L as a patient-reported outcome measure in evaluating community rehabilitation services in Alberta, Canada.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose(1) To assess responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L compared to Oxford hip and knee scores and the SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip (THR) or knee (TKR) replacement surgery; (2) to compare distribution and anchor-based methods of assessing responsiveness.
methodsQuestionnaires were mailed to consecutive patients following surgeon referral for primary THR or TKR and 1 year post-surgery. We assessed effect size (ES), standardized response mean (SRM), and standard error of measurement (SEM). Minimum important difference (MID) was the mean change in patients reporting somewhat better in hip or knee, health in general, and those who were satisfied with surgery (5-point scales). Responders were compared using MID versus 1 and 2SEM.
resultsThe sample of 537 (50% TKR) was composed of 56% female with a mean age of 64 years (SD 10). EQ-5D-5L ES was 1.86 (THR) and 1.19 (TKR) compared to 3.00 and 2.05 for Oxford scores, respectively. MID for the EQ-5D-5L was 0.22 (THR) and 0.20 (TKR) for patients who rated their hip or knee as somewhat better. There was a wide variation in the MID and the percentage of responders, depending on the joint, method of assessment, and the outcome measure. The percent agreement of responder classification using 2SEM vs. MID ranged from 79.6 to 99.6% for the EQ-5D-5L and from 69.4 to 94.8% for the Oxford scores.
conclusionsResponsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L was acceptable in TKR and THR. Caution should be taken in interpreting responder to TJR based on only one method of assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29423757What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.