Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29423661›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2018

Health Implications of Climate Change: a Review of the Literature About the Perception of the Public and Health Professionals.

Julia Hathaway, Edward W Maibach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fossil Health: Deconstructing the Health and Energy Relationship to Reimagine a Viable Future.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Infectious Disease Specialists' awareness, perceptions and attitudes toward ecological transition in healthcare: a cross-sectional study in France.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia HathawayCenter for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MS 6A8, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.
Edward W MaibachCenter for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MS 6A8, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA. emaibach@gmu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThrough a systematic search of English language peer-reviewed studies, we assess how health professionals and the public, worldwide, perceive the health implications of climate change. RECENT

findingsAmong health professionals, perception that climate change is harming health appears to be high, although self-assessed knowledge is low, and perceived need to learn more is high. Among the public, few North Americans can list any health impacts of climate change, or who is at risk, but appear to view climate change as harmful to health. Among vulnerable publics in Asia and Africa, awareness of increasing health harms due to specific changing climatic conditions is high. Americans across the political and climate change opinion spectra appear receptive to information about the health aspects of climate change, although findings are mixed. Health professionals feel the need to learn more, and the public appears open to learning more, about the health consequences of climate change.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClimate ChangeHealthPublic OpinionAttitude to HealthHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansAttitudesClimate changeClimatic changeHealthOpinionsPerceptionsPublic health

Identifiers

PMID29423661
PMCPMC5876339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.