Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29423658›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2018

Effects of contaminants of emerging concern on Myzus persicae (Sulzer, Hemiptera: Aphididae) biology and on their host plant, Capsicum annuum.

Marcus John Pennington, Jason A Rothman, Michael Bellinger Jones, Quinn S McFrederick, Jay Gan, John T Trumble

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of hydroponics-based evaluation for phenotyping tolerance/susceptibility to the aphid,Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcus John PenningtonGraduate Program in Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA. mpenn001@ucr.edu.
Jason A RothmanDepartment of Entomology, University of California, 417 Entomology Building, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Michael Bellinger JonesDepartment of Entomology, University of California, 417 Entomology Building, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Quinn S McFrederickDepartment of Entomology, University of California, 417 Entomology Building, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Jay GanGraduate Program in Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
John T TrumbleGraduate Program in Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
University of California, Riverside · US

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration NNX15AP99ANational Institute of Food and Agriculture 1011669U.S. Environmental Protection Agency R835829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many countries are utilizing reclaimed wastewater for agriculture as water demands due to drought, rising temperatures, and expanding human populations. Unfortunately, wastewater often contains biologically active, pseudopersistant pharmaceuticals, even after treatment. Runoff from agriculture and effluent from wastewater treatment plants also contribute high concentrations of pharmaceuticals to the environment. This study assessed the effects of common pharmaceuticals on an agricultural pest, the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer, Hemiptera: Aphididae). Second instar nymphs were transferred to bell peppers (Capsicum annuum) that were grown hydroponically. Treatment plants were spiked with contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) at environmentally relevant concentrations found in reclaimed wastewater. M. persicae displayed no differences in population growth or microbial community differences due to chemical treatments. Plants, however, displayed significant growth reduction in antibiotic and mixture treatments, specifically in wet root masses. Antibiotic treatment masses were significantly reduced in the total and root wet masses. Mixture treatments displayed an overall reduction in plant root wet mass. Our results suggest that the use of reclaimed wastewater for crop irrigation would not affect aphid populations, but could hinder or delay crop production.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringAnimalsAphidsCapsicumHumansPlant RootsTemperatureAntibioticsCECsMicrobial communitiesPollutionWastewater

Identifiers

PMID29423658
OpenAlexW2790425986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.