ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2018
Performance of a second generation pulmonary capnotracking system for continuous monitoring of cardiac output.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of a capnodynamic method estimating cardiac output during respiratory failure - before and after lung recruitment.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Article
- Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2018-2019 end of year summary: respiration.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Review
- [Foundations of Volumetric capnography : Principles of monitoring of metabolism and hemodynamics].Der Anaesthesist · 2020Review
- Clinical use of volumetric capnography in mechanically ventilated patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Review
- Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Review
- New generation continuous cardiac output monitoring from carbon dioxide elimination.BMC anesthesiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technologies for minimally-invasive cardiac output measurement in patients during surgery remain little used in routine practice. We tested a redeveloped system based on CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
29423554What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.