ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018
Genomic analysis of synchronous intracranial meningiomas with different histological grades.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole Exome Sequencing of Multiple Atypical Meningiomas in a Patient without History of Neurofibromatosis Type II: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2020Article
- Neurofibromatosis type 2 gene mutation and progesterone receptor messenger RNA expression in the pathogenesis of sporadic orbitocranial meningioma.International journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although meningioma is the most common primary tumor of the central nervous system, the mechanism of progression from benign to atypical or anaplastic grade remains elusive. The present case reports the genomic evaluation of two synchronous meningiomas with different histological grades (benign and atypical) in the same patient. Under the assumption that the atypical tumor may have progressed from the benign tumor, the clonal origin of the lesions was investigated to identify genomic events responsible for the oncogenic process of evolution to higher grades in meningioma. A 59 year-old female patient was diagnosed with two synchronous meningiomas with different histological grades, benign and atypical. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis of both tumors were done. WES analysis showed that each meningioma harbored distinct mutation profiles, and RNA-seq analysis revealed distinct gene expression profiles between the two tumors. The only apparent common genetic abnormality found in both tumors was the loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 22, raising the possibility that this event is the initial step in tumor formation, after which distinct subsequent mutations lead to the evolvement of two separate tumors of different grades. The result provides additional evidence on previous reports suggesting separate, independent mechanism of progression into higher grades in meningioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.