Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29423527›Full record

ArticleALTEX2018

A high-throughput approach to identify specific neurotoxicants/ developmental toxicants in human neuronal cell function assays.

Johannes Delp, Simon Gutbier, Stefanie Klima, Lisa Hoelting, Kevin Pinto-Gil, Jui-Hua Hsieh, Michael Aichem, Karsten Klein, Falk Schreiber, Raymond R Tice and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ALTEX, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Testing Strategies for Metabolite-Mediated Neurotoxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Johannes DelpIn vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Dept inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden foundation, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Simon GutbierIn vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Dept inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden foundation, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Stefanie KlimaIn vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Dept inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden foundation, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Lisa HoeltingIn vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Dept inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden foundation, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Kevin Pinto-GilResearch Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Dept. of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Jui-Hua HsiehKelly Government Solutions, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael AichemDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Karsten KleinDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Falk SchreiberDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Raymond R TiceDivision of National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Manuel PastorResearch Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Dept. of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Mamta BehlDivision of National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Marcel LeistIn vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Dept inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden foundation, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Funding

Toxicological Assessments for the National Toxicology ProgramZIAES103316 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALKER, NIGEL J · 2016 to 2019
$31.9M
Biomolecular Screening and Alternative Approaches for the National Toxicology ProgramZIAES103318 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CASEY, WARREN · 2016 to 2021
$25.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 ES999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The (developmental) neurotoxicity hazard is still unknown for most chemicals. Establishing a test battery covering most of the relevant adverse outcome pathways may close this gap, without requiring a huge animal experimentation program. Ideally, each of the assays would cover multiple mechanisms of toxicity. One candidate test is the human LUHMES cell-based NeuriTox test. To evaluate its readiness for larger-scale testing, a proof of concept library assembled by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) was screened. Of the 75 unique compounds, seven were defined as specifically neurotoxic after the hit-confirmation phase and additional ten compounds were generally cytotoxic within the concentration range of up to 20 micromolar. As complementary approach, the library was screened in the PeriTox test, which identifies toxicants affecting the human peripheral nervous system. Of the eight PeriTox hits, five were similar to the NeuriTox hits: rotenone, colchicine, diethylstilbestrol, berberine chloride, and valinomycin. The unique NeuriTox hit, methyl-phenylpyridinium (MPP+) is known from in vivo studies to affect only dopaminergic neurons (which LUHMES cells are). Conversely, the known peripheral neurotoxicant acrylamide was picked up in the PeriTox, but not in the NeuriTox assay. All of the five common hits had also been identified in the published neural crest migration (cMINC) assay, while none of them emerged as cardiotoxicant in a previous screen using the same library. These comparative data suggest that complementary in vitro tests can pick up a broad range of toxicants, and that multiple test results might help to predict organ specificity patterns.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysCells, CulturedDopaminergic NeuronsHumansToxicity Testscytotoxicitydevelopmental toxicityhigh content imagingneurite outgrowth inhibitionneurotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID29423527
PMCPMC10266261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.