Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29423501›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2018

Association of Sulindac and Erlotinib vs Placebo With Colorectal Neoplasia in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

N Jewel Samadder, Scott K Kuwada, Kenneth M Boucher, Kathryn Byrne, Priyanka Kanth, Wade Samowitz, David Jones, Sean V Tavtigian, Michelle Westover, Therese Berry and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01187901 (Genetic Events Leading to APC-Dependent Colon Cancer in High-Risk Families; a Clinical Trial of COX and EGFR Inhibition in Familial Polyposis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01187901 phase2completednot on this map

Genetic Events Leading to APC-Dependent Colon Cancer in High-Risk Families; a Clinical Trial of COX and EGFR Inhibition in Familial Polyposis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2010 to 2014Enrolled92ConditionsAdenomatous Polyposis ColiArmsErlotinib, Sulindac, Placebo A, Placebo B
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Gene Polyposis-Related Syndromes.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Familial Polyposis and Colon Cancer.South Asian journal of cancer · 2024
    Review
  15. Gastrointestinal Cancer Precursor Conditions and Their Detection.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  16. Why Is Wnt/β-Catenin Not Yet Targeted in Routine Cancer Care?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention: A Dream Coming True?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N Jewel SamadderHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Scott K KuwadaDepartment of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
Kenneth M BoucherHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Kathryn ByrneDepartment of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Priyanka KanthDepartment of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Wade SamowitzHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
David JonesHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Sean V TavtigianHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Michelle WestoverHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Therese BerryHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Kory JaspersonHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Lisa PappasHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Laurel SmithHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Danielle SampleHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Randall W BurtHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Deborah W NeklasonHuntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Huntsman Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Hawaii System · US

Funding

APC and Retinoids in Zebrafish Enterocyte DevelopmentR01CA116468 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JONES, DAVID A · 2005 to 2020
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are at markedly increased risk for colorectal polyps and cancer. A combination of sulindac and erlotinib led to a 71% reduction in duodenal polyp burden in a phase 2 trial. Objective: To evaluate effect of sulindac and erlotinib on colorectal adenoma regression in patients with FAP. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prespecified secondary analysis for colorectal adenoma regression was carried out using data from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, enrolling 92 patients with FAP, conducted from July 2010 to June 2014 in Salt Lake City, Utah. Interventions: Patients were randomized to sulindac, 150 mg twice daily, and erlotinib, 75 mg daily (n = 46), vs placebo (n = 46) for 6 months. Main Outcomes and Measurements: The total number of polyps in the intact colorectum, ileal pouch anal anastomosis, or ileo-rectum were recorded at baseline and 6 months. The primary outcomes were change in total colorectal polyp count and percentage change in colorectal polyps, following 6 months of treatment. Results: Eighty-two randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 40 [13] years; 49 [60%] women) had colorectal polyp count data available for this secondary analysis: 22 with intact colon, 44 with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and 16 with ileo-rectal anastomosis; 41 patients received sulindac/erlotinib and 41 placebo. The total colorectal polyp count was significantly different between the placebo and sulindac-erlotinib group at 6 months in patients with net percentage change of 69.4% in those with an intact colorectum compared with placebo (95% CI, 28.8%-109.2%; P = .009). Conclusion and Relevance: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial we showed that combination treatment with sulindac and erlotinib compared with placebo resulted in significantly lower colorectal polyp burden after 6 months of treatment. There was a reduction in polyp burden in both those with an entire colorectum and those with only a rectal pouch or rectum. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01187901.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsColorectal NeoplasmsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSulindacTreatment OutcomeErlotinib HydrochlorideSulindac

Identifiers

PMID29423501
PMCPMC5885170
OpenAlexW2789271913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.