Trial reportJAMA oncology2018
Association of Sulindac and Erlotinib vs Placebo With Colorectal Neoplasia in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01187901 (Genetic Events Leading to APC-Dependent Colon Cancer in High-Risk Families; a Clinical Trial of COX and EGFR Inhibition in Familial Polyposis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Genetic Events Leading to APC-Dependent Colon Cancer in High-Risk Families; a Clinical Trial of COX and EGFR Inhibition in Familial Polyposis Patients
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2024 for the clinical practice of hereditary colorectal cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Guideline
- Updated European guidelines for clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP), gastric adenocarcinoma, proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS) and other rare adenomatous polyposis syndromes: a joint EHTG-ESCP revision.The British journal of surgery · 2024Guideline
- De Novo Secondary Adenocarcinoma in the Colon Used as Urinary Diversion Not in Contact with the Fecal Stream: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Pediatric Hereditary Polyposis Syndromes: Diagnosis, Surveillance, and Management Across Evolving Guidelines.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Review
- Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Gene Polyposis-Related Syndromes.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Dose-Response Relationship of Niclosamide and Metformin Combination in ApcGut and liver · 2026Article
- Familial Adenomatous Polyposis-Risk of Cancer, Cancer Prevention, and Long-Term Consequences: Learnings from Five Decades with the Danish Polyposis Register.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Antitumor efficacy of intermittent low-dose erlotinib plus sulindac via MHC upregulation and remodeling of the immune cell niche.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Familial adenomatous polyposis: non-surgical management of large bowel disease: endoscopic and chemoprevention strategies.Familial cancer · 2025Review
- Sulindac exhibits anti-proliferative and anti-invasive effects and enhances the sensitivity to paclitaxel in ovarian cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Identification of biomarkers for the diagnosis in colorectal polyps and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) by bioinformatics analysis and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of EGFR and COX pathway inhibition in human colon organoids of serrated polyposis and other hereditary cancer syndromes.Familial cancer · 2024Article
- Familial Polyposis and Colon Cancer.South Asian journal of cancer · 2024Review
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Precursor Conditions and Their Detection.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Why Is Wnt/β-Catenin Not Yet Targeted in Routine Cancer Care?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Endoscopic and chemopreventive management of familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome.Familial cancer · 2023Review
- Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention: A Dream Coming True?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Phenolic Phytochemicals for Prevention and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Critical Evaluation of In Vivo Studies.Cancers · 2023Review
- Combination Chemotherapy of Multidrug-resistant Early-stage Colon Cancer: Determining Optimal Dose Schedules by High-performance Computer Simulation.Cancer research communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are at markedly increased risk for colorectal polyps and cancer. A combination of sulindac and erlotinib led to a 71% reduction in duodenal polyp burden in a phase 2 trial. Objective: To evaluate effect of sulindac and erlotinib on colorectal adenoma regression in patients with FAP. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prespecified secondary analysis for colorectal adenoma regression was carried out using data from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, enrolling 92 patients with FAP, conducted from July 2010 to June 2014 in Salt Lake City, Utah. Interventions: Patients were randomized to sulindac, 150 mg twice daily, and erlotinib, 75 mg daily (n = 46), vs placebo (n = 46) for 6 months. Main Outcomes and Measurements: The total number of polyps in the intact colorectum, ileal pouch anal anastomosis, or ileo-rectum were recorded at baseline and 6 months. The primary outcomes were change in total colorectal polyp count and percentage change in colorectal polyps, following 6 months of treatment. Results: Eighty-two randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 40 [13] years; 49 [60%] women) had colorectal polyp count data available for this secondary analysis: 22 with intact colon, 44 with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and 16 with ileo-rectal anastomosis; 41 patients received sulindac/erlotinib and 41 placebo. The total colorectal polyp count was significantly different between the placebo and sulindac-erlotinib group at 6 months in patients with net percentage change of 69.4% in those with an intact colorectum compared with placebo (95% CI, 28.8%-109.2%; P = .009). Conclusion and Relevance: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial we showed that combination treatment with sulindac and erlotinib compared with placebo resulted in significantly lower colorectal polyp burden after 6 months of treatment. There was a reduction in polyp burden in both those with an entire colorectum and those with only a rectal pouch or rectum. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01187901.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.