ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2017
Recent Advances in Neural Electrode-Tissue Interfaces.
Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic alteration of CaBiomaterials · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Foreign Body Responses to Neural Electrodes and Surface Biofunctionalization Strategies for Interface Modulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Multi-Channel Neural Interface for Neural Recording and Neuromodulation.Small methods · 2026Review
- Facile Deep Brain Electrode Coating with MXene for Improved Electrode Performance.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Single-Step Patterning of Biocompatible Neural Electrodes Using Black-Pt Functionalized Laser-Induced Graphene for in Vivo Electrophysiology.Small methods · 2025Article
- Chronic alteration of CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Biomechanical research using advanced micro-nano devices: In-Vitro cell Characterization focus.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- Article
- Quantifying physical degradation alongside recording and stimulation performance of 980 intracortical microelectrodes chronically implanted in three humans for 956-2130 days.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Quantifying physical degradation alongside recording and stimulation performance of 980 intracortical microelectrodes chronically implanted in three humans for 956-2246 days.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Sustainability inspired fabrication of next generation neurostimulation and cardiac rhythm management electrodes via reactive hierarchical surface restructuring.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024Article
- Multifunctional Nanomaterials for Advancing Neural Interfaces: Recording, Stimulation, and Beyond.Accounts of chemical research · 2024Review
- Adhesion of retinal cells to gold surfaces by biomimetic molecules.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Recent Advancements in Graphene-Based Implantable Electrodes for Neural Recording/Stimulation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Nanotopography-enhanced biomimetic coating maintains bioactivity after weeks of dry storage and improves chronic neural recording.Biomaterials · 2023Article
- Intracortical brain-computer interfaces in primates: a review and outlook.Biomedical engineering letters · 2023Review
- Chronic stability of a neuroprosthesis comprising multiple adjacent Utah arrays in monkeys.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- Direct laser writing of 3D electrodes on flexible substrates.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Surface Area and Local Curvature: Why Roughness Improves the Bioactivity of Neural Implants.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2022Article
- Engineering Tissues of the Central Nervous System: Interfacing Conductive Biomaterials with Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurotechnology is facing an exponential growth in the recent decades. Neural electrode-tissue interface research has been well recognized as an instrumental component of neurotechnology development. While satisfactory long-term performance was demonstrated in some applications, such as cochlear implants and deep brain stimulators, more advanced neural electrode devices requiring higher resolution for single unit recording or microstimulation still face significant challenges in reliability and longevity. In this article, we review the most recent findings that contribute to our current understanding of the sources of poor reliability and longevity in neural recording or stimulation, including the material failure, biological tissue response and the interplay between the two. The newly developed characterization tools are introduced from electrophysiology models, molecular and biochemical analysis, material characterization to live imaging. The effective strategies that have been applied to improve the interface are also highlighted. Finally, we discuss the challenges and opportunities in improving the interface and achieving seamless integration between the implanted electrodes and neural tissue both anatomically and functionally.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.