Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29423327›Full record

ReviewStroke research and treatment2017

Resistance Training and Stroke: A Critical Analysis of Different Training Programs.

Bruno Bavaresco Gambassi, Hélio José Coelho-Junior, Paulo Adriano Schwingel, Fabiano de Jesus Furtado Almeida, Tânia Maria Gaspar Novais, Paula de Lourdes Lauande Oliveira, Bismarck Ascar Sauaia, Cristiane Dominice Melo, Marco Carlos Uchida, Bruno Rodrigues

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bruno Bavaresco GambassiFaculty of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3852-0602
Hélio José Coelho-JuniorFaculty of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7482-9514
Paulo Adriano SchwingelHuman Performance Research Laboratory, University of Pernambuco, Petrolina, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2935-3403
Fabiano de Jesus Furtado AlmeidaPhysical Education Department, Ceuma University, São Luis, MA, Brazil.
Tânia Maria Gaspar NovaisPhysical Education Department, Ceuma University, São Luis, MA, Brazil.
Paula de Lourdes Lauande OliveiraPhysical Education Department, Ceuma University, São Luis, MA, Brazil.
Bismarck Ascar SauaiaPhysical Education Department, Ceuma University, São Luis, MA, Brazil.
Cristiane Dominice MeloPhysical Education Department, Ceuma University, São Luis, MA, Brazil.
Marco Carlos UchidaFaculty of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4128-4965
Bruno RodriguesFaculty of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4246-4703

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to carry out a literature review on the overall benefits of resistance training (RT) after stroke and undertake a critical analysis of the resistance exercise programs surveyed (rest interval between sets and exercises, number of sets, number of repetitions, intensity, duration of training, and weekly frequency). To obtain articles for the review, we searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Inclusion criteria were considered using the PICO (population, intervention, control/comparison, and outcome variables) model. The following characteristics were recorded for all articles: type of study, author, year of publication, participants (time after stroke, sample size, and age), benefits of RT, and structured resistance exercise programs. Positive effects of training were found on anxiety status, quality of life, muscle hypertrophy, cognitive function, strength, and muscle power. Only 5 studies described the main variables of RT in detail. Lack of control of some variables of RT may negatively affect the results of this practice. The findings of the present study may further inform health and physical conditioning professionals on the importance and necessity of using the main variables in the search for benefits for individuals with stroke.

Identifiers

PMID29423327
PMCPMC5750509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.