Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29423280›Full record

ArticleNPJ Regenerative medicine2018

Biomaterials-enabled cornea regeneration in patients at high risk for rejection of donor tissue transplantation.

M Mirazul Islam, Oleksiy Buznyk, Jagadesh C Reddy, Nataliya Pasyechnikova, Emilio I Alarcon, Sally Hayes, Philip Lewis, Per Fagerholm, Chaoliang He, Stanislav Iakymenko and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

M Mirazul Islam *1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9999-0427
Oleksiy Buznyk *1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5534-6258
Jagadesh C Reddy *4Tej Kohli Cornea Institute, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Nataliya Pasyechnikova *Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine, Odessa, Ukraine.
Emilio I Alarcon5Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5100-6179
Sally Hayes6School of Optometry and Vision Sciences College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Philip Lewis6School of Optometry and Vision Sciences College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Per Fagerholm1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Chaoliang He8Key Laboratory of Polymer Eco-materials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, China.
Stanislav IakymenkoFilatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine, Odessa, Ukraine.
Wenguang Liu9School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Keith M Meek *6School of Optometry and Vision Sciences College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Virender S Sangwan *4Tej Kohli Cornea Institute, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8229-4158
May Griffith *1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1222-6720
Linköping University · SECardiff University · GBFilatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine · UAL V Prasad Eye Institute · INChinese Academy of Sciences · CNTianjin University of Technology · CNUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K000837/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The severe worldwide shortage of donor organs, and severe pathologies placing patients at high risk for rejecting conventional cornea transplantation, have left many corneal blind patients untreated. Following successful pre-clinical evaluation in mini-pigs, we tested a biomaterials-enabled pro-regeneration strategy to restore corneal integrity in an open-label observational study of six patients. Cell-free corneal implants comprising recombinant human collagen and phosphorylcholine were grafted by anterior lamellar keratoplasty into corneas of unilaterally blind patients diagnosed at high-risk for rejecting donor allografts. They were followed-up for a mean of 24 months. Patients with acute disease (ulceration) were relieved of pain and discomfort within 1-2 weeks post-operation. Patients with scarred or ulcerated corneas from severe infection showed better vision improvement, followed by corneas with burns. Corneas with immune or degenerative conditions transplanted for symptom relief only showed no vision improvement overall. However, grafting promoted nerve regeneration as observed by improved touch sensitivity to near normal levels in all patients tested, even for those with little/no sensitivity before treatment. Overall, three out of six patients showed significant vision improvement. Others were sufficiently stabilized to allow follow-on surgery to restore vision. Grafting outcomes in mini-pig corneas were superior to those in human subjects, emphasizing that animal models are only predictive for patients with non-severely pathological corneas; however, for establishing parameters such as stable corneal tissue and nerve regeneration, our pig model is satisfactory. While further testing is merited, we have nevertheless shown that cell-free implants are potentially safe, efficacious options for treating high-risk patients.

Identifiers

PMID29423280
PMCPMC5792605
OpenAlexW2782616479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.