ReviewJournal of hip preservation surgery2018
Refractory pain following hip arthroscopy: evaluation and management.
Review in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Incidence and Outcomes Following Treatment of Capsulolabral Adhesions in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2023Pooled it
- Periacetabular osteotomy after failed hip arthroscopy demonstrates improved outcomes in a heterogenous patient population: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of the Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Combined with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.Journal of pain research · 2024Trial
- Concomitant sacroiliac joint abnormalities in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.International orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Six-Month Functional Scores Predict 5-Year Achievement of the Minimal Clinically Important Differences After Hip Arthroscopy for Symptomatic Acetabular Labral Tears.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Painful Hips After Hip Arthroscopy Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Adhesions in the setting of hip arthroscopy.EFORT open reviews · 2023Review
- Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Arthrography of Post-Arthroscopy Hip Instability Demonstrates Increased Effective Intracapsular Volume and Anterosuperior Capsular Changes.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Failure to Achieve Threshold Scores on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Within 1 Year Has a Predictive Risk of Subsequent Hip Surgery Within 5 Years of Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Case-Control Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Editorial.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2021Article
- Factors associated with high pain catastrophizing in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020Article
- The impact of mental health disorders on outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a systematic review.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020Review
- Return to Sport After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in NCAA Division I Athletes: Experience at a Single Institution.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2020Article
- Findings on repaired full-thickness acetabular articular cartilage defects during revision hip arthroscopy allowing a second look.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020Article
- Contemporary Management of the Hip Capsule During Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2019Review
- Preserving the chondrolabral junction reduces the rate of capsular adhesions.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2019Article
- A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With increased knowledge and understanding of hip pathology, hip arthroscopy is rapidly becoming a popular treatment option for young patients with hip pain. Despite improved clinical and radiographic outcomes with arthroscopic treatment, some patients may have ongoing pain and less than satisfactory outcomes. While the reasons leading to failed hip arthroscopy are multifactorial, patient selection, surgical technique and rehabilitation all play a role. Patients with failed hip arthroscopy should undergo a thorough history and physical examination, as well as indicated imaging. A treatment plan should then be developed based on pertinent findings from the workup and in conjunction with the patient. Depending on the etiology of failed hip arthroscopy, management may be nonsurgical or surgical, which may include revision arthroscopic or open surgery, periacetabular osteotomy or joint arthroplasty. Revision surgery may be appropriate in settings including, but not limited to, incompletely treated femoroacetabular impingement, postoperative adhesions, heterotopic ossification, instability, hip dysplasia or advanced degeneration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.