Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29423220›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2018

Mixing modes in a population-based interview survey: comparison of a sequential and a concurrent mixed-mode design for public health research.

Elvira Mauz, Elena von der Lippe, Jennifer Allen, Ralph Schilling, Stephan Müters, Jens Hoebel, Patrick Schmich, Matthias Wetzstein, Panagiotis Kamtsiuris, Cornelia Lange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Organizing the health interview survey at the local level: design of a pilot study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elvira Mauz1Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1988-9789
Elena von der Lippe1Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Jennifer Allen1Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Ralph Schilling2Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan Müters1Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Jens Hoebel1Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Patrick Schmich1Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias Wetzstein1Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Panagiotis Kamtsiuris1Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Cornelia Lange1Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation-based surveys currently face the problem of decreasing response rates. Mixed-mode designs are now being implemented more often to account for this, to improve sample composition and to reduce overall costs. This study examines whether a concurrent or sequential mixed-mode design achieves better results on a number of indicators of survey quality.

methodsData were obtained from a population-based health interview survey of adults in Germany that was conducted as a methodological pilot study as part of the German Health Update (GEDA). Participants were randomly allocated to one of two surveys; each of the surveys had a different design. In the concurrent mixed-mode design (

resultsNo systematic differences were identified between the two mixed-mode designs in terms of response rates, the socio-demographic characteristics of the achieved samples, or the prevalence rates of the health indicators under study. The sequential design gained a higher rate of online respondents. Very few telephone interviews were conducted for either design. With regard to data quality, the sequential design (which had more online respondents) showed less item non-response. There were minor differences between the designs in terms of their costs. Postage and printing costs were lower in the concurrent design, but labour costs were lower in the sequential design. No differences in health indicators were found between the two designs. Modelling these results for higher response rates and larger net sample sizes indicated that the sequential design was more cost and time-effective.

conclusionsThis study contributes to the research available on implementing mixed-mode designs as part of public health surveys. Our findings show that SAQ-Paper and SAQ-Web questionnaires can be combined effectively. Sequential mixed-mode designs with higher rates of online respondents may be of greater benefit to studies with larger net sample sizes than concurrent mixed-mode designs.

Indexed as

Concurrent mixed-mode designHealth interview surveysMixed-mode designsPopulation health monitoringSelf-administered questionnairesSequential mixed-mode design

Identifiers

PMID29423220
PMCPMC5791202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.