ReviewJournal of animal science and biotechnology2018
Use of gene-editing technology to introduce targeted modifications in pigs.
Review in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overcoming Barriers in Porcine SCNT: A Comprehensive Review of Developmental Challenges and Innovations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Insights from adaptive immune regulation for disease resistance breeding in livestock and poultry.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- CRISPR mediated PRRS resistant pigs: biological success, welfare implications, and ethical regulatory challenges for sustainable swine production.Porcine health management · 2026Review
- Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Chrononutrition: Potential, Challenges, and Application in Managing Obesity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Reproduction (Re)defined.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025Article
- The Future Exploring of Gut Microbiome-Immunity Interactions: From In Vivo/Vitro Models to In Silico Innovations.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Novel off-Targeting Events Identified after Genome Wide Analysis of CRISPR-Cas Edited Pigs.The CRISPR journal · 2024Article
- Targeted Integration of siRNA against Porcine Cytomegalovirus (PCMV) Enhances the Resistance of Porcine Cells to PCMV.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Pig Models in Retinal Research and Retinal Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024Review
- Precise genome-editing in human diseases: mechanisms, strategies and applications.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Production of MSTN knockout porcine cells using adenine base-editing-mediated exon skipping.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2023Article
- Methods of crop improvement and applications towards fortifying food security.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- Mechanisms regulating the CRISPR-Cas systems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Genome Editing in Pigs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- New pathogenic insights from large animal models of neurodegenerative diseases.Protein & cell · 2022Review
- One-Step In Vitro Generation of ETV2-Null Pig Embryos.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- The application of new breeding technology based on gene editing in pig industry - A review.Animal bioscience · 2022Article
- Cell Cycle Stage and DNA Repair Pathway Influence CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Efficiency in Porcine Embryos.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Adenine base-editing-mediated exon skipping induces gene knockout in cultured pig cells.Biotechnology letters · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pigs are an important resource in agriculture and serve as a model for human diseases. Due to their physiological and anatomical similarities with humans, pigs can recapitulate symptoms of human diseases, making them a useful model in biomedicine. However, in the past pig models have not been widely used partially because of the difficulty in genetic modification. The lack of true embryonic stem cells in pigs forced researchers to utilize genetic modification in somatic cells and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) to generate genetically engineered (GE) pigs carrying site-specific modifications. Although possible, this approach is extremely inefficient and GE pigs born through this method often presented developmental defects associated with the cloning process. Advancement in the gene-editing systems such as Zinc-Finger Nucleases (ZFNs), Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated 9 (Cas9) system have dramatically increased the efficiency of producing GE pigs. These gene-editing systems, specifically engineered endonucleases, are based on inducing double-stranded breaks (DSBs) at a specific location, and then site-specific modifications can be introduced through one of the two DNA repair pathways: non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology direct repair (HDR). Random insertions or deletions (indels) can be introduced through NHEJ and specific nucleotide sequences can be introduced through HDR, if donor DNA is provided. Use of these engineered endonucleases provides a higher success in genetic modifications, multiallelic modification of the genome, and an opportunity to introduce site-specific modifications during embryogenesis, thus bypassing the need of SCNT in GE pig production. This review will provide a historical prospective of GE pig production and examples of how the gene-editing system, led by engineered endonucleases, have improved GE pig production. We will also present some of our current progress related to the optimal use of CRISPR/Cas9 system during embryogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.