Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29423181›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2017

Skilled attendant at birth and newborn survival in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Agbessi Amouzou, Meng Ziqi, Liliana Carvajal-Aguirre, John Quinley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agbessi AmouzouInstitute for International Programs, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Meng ZiqiData and Analytics, Division of Data, Research and Policy, UNICEF, New York, New York, USA.
Liliana Carvajal-AguirreData and Analytics, Division of Data, Research and Policy, UNICEF, New York, New York, USA.
John QuinleyData and Analytics, Division of Data, Research and Policy, UNICEF, New York, New York, USA.
United Nations Children's Fund · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have shown higher neonatal mortality among births delivered by a skilled attendant at birth (SAB) compared to those who were not in sub-Saharan African countries. Deaths during the neonatal period are concentrated in the first 7 days of life, with about one third of these deaths occurring during the first day of life. We reassessed the relationship between SAB and neonatal mortality by distinguishing deaths on the first day of life from those on days 2-27.

methodsWe used data on births in the past five years from recent demographic and health survey (DHS) between 2010 and 2014 in 20 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The main categorical outcome was 1) newborns who died within the first day of birth (day 0-1), 2) newborns who died between days 2-27, and 3) newborns who survived the neonatal period. We ran generalized linear mixed model with multinomial distribution and random effect for country on pooled data. Additionally, we ran a separate model restricted to births with SAB and assessed the association of receipt of seven antenatal care (ANC) and two immediate postnatal care interventions on risk of death on days 0-1 and days 2-27. These variables were assessed as proxy of quality of antenatal and postnatal care.

resultsWe found no statistically significant difference in risk of death on first day of life between newborns with SAB compared to those without. However, after the first day of life, newborns delivered with SAB were 16% less likely to die within 2-27 days than those without SAB (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.71-0.99). Among births with skilled attendant, those who were weighed at birth and those who were initiated early on breastfeeding were significantly less likely to die on days 0-1 (respectively OR = 0.42 95% CI = 0.29-0.62 and OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.18-0.31) or on days 2-27 (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.45-0.81 and OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 47-0.74, respectively). Newborns whose mothers received an additional ANC intervention had no improved survival chances during days 0-1 of life. However, there was significant association on days 2-27 where newborns whose mothers received an additional ANC interventions had higher survival chances (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93-0.98).

conclusionFindings demonstrate the vulnerability of newborns immediately after birth, compounded with insufficient quality of care. Improving the quality of care around the time of birth will significantly improve survival and therefore accelerate reduction in neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan African countries. Improved approaches for measuring skilled attendant at birth are also needed.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityAdolescentAdultAfrica South of the SaharaDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth SurveysHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPregnancySurvival AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29423181
PMCPMC5804504
OpenAlexW2778480463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.