ArticleJournal of global health2017
Gap between contact and content in maternal and newborn care: An analysis of data from 20 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in Journal of global health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- A rapid systematic review and evidence synthesis of effective coverage measures and cascades for childbirth, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries.Journal of global health · 2022Pooled it
- Determinants of antenatal care utilisation in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- A digital health registry with clinical decision support for improving quality of antenatal care in Palestine (eRegQual): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, controlled, superiority trial.The Lancet. Digital health · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Measuring antenatal care timing and content across 131 low-income and middle-income countries, 1995-2023: a systematic analysis of trends.The Lancet. Global health · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Newborn postnatal care: gap in contact and effective coverage and discrepancy in response in Ethiopia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Provision of recommended antenatal care services in Ethiopia: missed opportunity for screening and counselling.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Predictors of Antenatal Care Service Utilization Among Women of Reproductive Age in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Determinants of male involvement in postnatal care service utilization among men whose wives gave birth in the last year.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- Neonatal indicator data in Tanzania District Health Information System: evaluation of availability and quality of selected newborn indicators, 2015-2022.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Beyond facility-based births: Is Uganda delivering effective maternal and newborn care? An analysis of the 2022 demographic health survey and 2023 harmonized health facility assessment survey.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Helping behaviour of volunteers in providing post-disaster psychosocial assistance.Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa) · 2025Article
- The nexus between maternal antenatal care attendance, newborn postnatal care and neonatal mortality in India: a matched case-control study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Quality of antenatal care services received by women of reproductive age prior to delivery in selected public health facilities in the northern zone of Ghana.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Delivery and postnatal care among women in 71 low- and middle-income countries: analyzing coverage gaps using household surveys.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Quality adjusted coverage of family planning services in low- and middle-income countries: Analysis of 33 countries using Demographic and Health Survey data.Journal of global health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the last decade, coverage of maternal and newborn health indicators used for global monitoring and reporting have increased substantially but reductions in maternal and neonatal mortality have remained slow. This has led to an increased recognition and concern that these standard globally agreed upon measures of antenatal care (ANC), skilled birth attendance (SBA) and postnatal care (PNC) only capture the level of contacts with the health system and provide little indication of actual content of services received by mothers and their newborns. Over this period, large household surveys have captured measures of maternal and newborn care mainly through questions assessing contacts during the antenatal, delivery and postnatal periods along with some measures of content of care. This study aims to describe the gap between contact and content -as a proxy for quality- of maternal and newborn health services by assessing level of co-coverage of ANC and PNC interventions.
methodsWe used Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from 20 countries between 2010 and 2015. We analysed the proportion of women with at least 1 and 4+ antenatal care visit, who received 8 interventions. We also assessed the percentage of newborns delivered with a skilled birth attendant who received 7 interventions. We ran random effect logistic regression to assess factors associated with receiving all interventions during the antenatal and postnatal period.
resultsWhile on average 51% of women in the analysis received four ANC visits with at least one visit from a skilled health provider, only 5% of them received all 8 ANC interventions. Similarly, during the postnatal period though two-thirds (65%) of births were attended by a skilled birth attendant, only 3% of newborns received all 7 PNC interventions. The odds of receiving all ANC and PNC interventions were higher for women with higher education and higher wealth status.
conclusionThe gap between coverage and content as a proxy of quality of antenatal and postnatal care is excessively large in all countries. In order to accelerate maternal and newborn survival and achieve Sustainable Development Goals, increased efforts are needed to improve both the coverage and quality of maternal and newborn health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.