Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29423102›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Optimal time of tumour response evaluation and effectiveness of hypofractionated proton beam therapy for inoperable or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

Tae Hyun Kim, Joong-Won Park, Bo Hyun Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Ju Hee Lee, Sang Myung Woo, Young-Hwan Koh, Woo Jin Lee and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tae Hyun KimCenter for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Joong-Won ParkCenter for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Bo Hyun KimCenter for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Dae Yong KimCenter for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Sung Ho MoonCenter for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Sang Soo KimCenter for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Ju Hee LeeCenter for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Sang Myung WooCenter for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Young-Hwan KohCenter for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Woo Jin LeeCenter for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Chang-Min KimCenter for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
National Cancer Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the optimal time of tumour response and effectiveness of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

resultsOverall, treatment was well tolerated with no grade toxicity ≥3. Of 71 patients, 66 patients (93%) eventually reached complete response (CR) after PBT: 93.9% (62 of 66) of patients who reached CR within 12 months, and the remaining 4 patients (6.1%) reached CR at 12.5, 16.2, 19.1 and 21.7 months, respectively. The three-year local progression-free survival (LPFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS rates were 89.9%, 26.8%, and 74.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the tumour response was an independent prognostic factor for LPFS, RFS, and OS.

conclusionMost CR was achieved within 1 year after PBT and further salvage treatments in PBT field might be postponed up to approximately 18-24 months. Hypofractionated PBT could be good alternative for HCC patients who are unsuitable for surgical or invasive treatments with curative intent. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy-one inoperable or recurrent HCC patients underwent hypofractionated PBT using 66 GyE in 10 fractions. The tumour responses were defined as the maximal tumour response observed during the follow-up period using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomaproton beam therapytumour response

Identifiers

PMID29423102
PMCPMC5790519
OpenAlexW2777011329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.