ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2018
Black tea and
Article in American journal of translational research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of dietary Dendrobium nobile Lindl. On production performance, immune function and caecal microbiota of Chishui black-bone hens.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Schisandrol A Exhibits Estrogenic Activity via Estrogen Receptor α-Dependent Signaling Pathway in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Cells.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, phytoestrogens have been shown as useful selective estrogen receptor modulators. The estrogen-like effects of black tea (BT) and D. candidum (DC), as well as the combination of the two herbs, have remained largely elusive. This study aims to investigate the phytoestrogenic effect of BT and DC extract, and the possible mechanism. The effects on T47D (ER+ cell line) proliferation were evaluated by using MTT assay. The S phase proportion of ER+ cells was determined by using flow cytometry. The estrogen antagonist ICI 182,780 was applied to block the ER function. The activation of ER-mediated PI3K/AKT and ERK signal pathways were observed by using western blot. Expression of ERα and PGR, as well as PS2 and Cyclin D1 were detected by using western blot and real-time quantitative PCR. Firstly, our results found that BT and DC extracts promoted cell proliferation in ER-positive cells, and this effect was ER-dependent. Besides, BT and DC extracts increased the S-phase cell number. Next, PI3K, AKT and ERK pathways below ER were activated by phytoestrogen treatment, and this activation was blocked by the ER antagonist. Moreover, prolonged BT and DC treatments increased the expression of ESR1 and PGR. Consistently, the mRNA levels of not only ESR1 and PGR but also estrogen-dependent effectors ps2 and cyclin D1, were increased by phytoestrogens and blocked by ICI 182,780. Taken Together, BT and DC extracts have phytoestrogenic effects, and this may provide new ideas and experimental basis for the development and application of phytoestrogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29422998PMC5801351W2976089867What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.